search for: cd928d07

On Tue, Dec 9, 2008 at 6:11 AM, Zoltan Varga <vargaz at gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > > Here is the next iteration of the patch. The only comment not > addressed is this one: > Thanks! It's looking good. >> It would be better to implement a target-independent check for >> overflow for the "Legal" case (like how SADDO does). Hacker's > Delight

Hi, Here is the next iteration of the patch. The only comment not addressed is this one: > It would be better to implement a target-independent check for > overflow for the "Legal" case (like how SADDO does). Hacker's > Delight > has some hints on how to do this. It's not easy for the signed case, > but is do-able. It can be lowered to a division + a branch,

...vm.cs.uiuc.edu > http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev > -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: llvm-ovf.diff Type: text/x-diff Size: 37966 bytes Desc: not available URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20081209/cd928d07/attachment.diff>