search for: cd8c557d

...nalty. I'll be interested to see what the time results of the DWARF linker are once further improvements to it have been made. Thanks, James > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20201105/cd8c557d/attachment.html>

Great, thanks! Those results are about roughly what I was expecting. I assume "compilation time" is actually just the link time? I find it particularly interesting that the DWARFLinker rewriting solution produces the same size improvement in .debug_line as the fragmented DWARF approach. That suggests that in that case, fragmented DWARF output is probably about as optimal as it can get.