Displaying 2 results from an estimated 2 matches for "cd705d2c".
Did you mean:
c0105d2c
2013 May 16
0
[LLVMdev] #APP/#NOAPP
..." (where it can
skip all that stuff).
That these pragmas *also* mark where the user's inline asm ended up seems
to just be a happy coincidence.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20130515/cd705d2c/attachment.html>
2013 May 06
4
[LLVMdev] #APP/#NOAPP
On 05/06/2013 08:51 AM, Rafael Espíndola wrote:
>> It's working fine just that it's ugly to see those APP/NOAPP markers.
> Inline assembly is inline assembly. It has the semantics defined in
> the IL documentation and should all be treated uniformly.
>
> I guess I would be OK with unconditionally removing those comments (I
> don't see a lot of value in them) or