Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "ccmakemov".
2007 Oct 23
0
[LLVMdev] me being stupid: me vs the llvm codebase...
On Oct 23, 2007, at 18:19, BGB wrote:
> On Oct 23, 2007, at 11:45, Gordon Henriksen wrote:
>
>> Generally speaking, LLVM neither helps nor hinders here. Maybe
>> someone will follow up with whether the JIT uses stub functions
>> which would enable dynamic relinking If not, it would be a
>> straightforward, if platform-specific, feature to add.
>
> I
2007 Oct 24
2
[LLVMdev] me being stupid: me vs the llvm codebase...
...s a proxy to the function (any future attempts at relinking the function then simply adjust its associated pointer).
potentially, this could also be made the default behavior for when relinking functions (if they are being forcibly relinked, well, assume they are being made movable).
or such...
ccMakeMovable(char *func); //an explicit call to the VM
__movable void foo(int x)
{
//do something...
}
even more interestingly:
if the same compiler were also used for static compilation, it could be used as a special feature to make such dynamic movability available even for statically compiled a...
2007 Oct 23
2
[LLVMdev] me being stupid: me vs the llvm codebase...
----- Original Message -----
From: "Gordon Henriksen" <gordonhenriksen at mac.com>
To: "LLVM Developers Mailing List" <llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu>
Sent: Wednesday, October 24, 2007 1:45 AM
Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] me being stupid: me vs the llvm codebase...
On Oct 23, 2007, at 05:52, BGB wrote:
> I am assuming then that some external assembler is used (such as
>