search for: cclements

This makes it work for us: > On Jun 12, 2015, at 5:02 PM, Chris Clements <cclements at outlook.com> wrote: > > This looks like the culprit: > > http://www.tinc-vpn.org/git/browse?p=tinc;a=commit;h=7730d5f3ed9bd7c011dced5808130ffcbd74ea6b <http://www.tinc-vpn.org/git/browse?p=tinc;a=commit;h=7730d5f3ed9bd7c011dced5808130ffcbd74ea6b> > > >> On Ju...

...as opposed to switch mode. > > I'm trying to narrow this down to a recent commit, but I can't find > anything obvious. Did you have a working setup with a previous > tinc-1.1 version? Do you have time to try a git bisect? > > On 11 June 2015 at 23:17, Chris Clements <cclements at outlook.com> wrote: >> Have an interesting issue that's cropped up for us. We have a switch based vpn setup with multiple endpoints, some publicly accessible, some behind hide NAT. What we've noticed is that every machine can reach each other's VPN IP's up to a certain...

I'm unable to reproduce. Are you using 802.1Q (VLANs) by any chance? On 13 June 2015 at 00:15, Chris Clements <cclements at outlook.com> wrote: > This makes it work for us: > > > > On Jun 12, 2015, at 5:02 PM, Chris Clements <cclements at outlook.com> wrote: > > This looks like the culprit: > > http://www.tinc-vpn.org/git/browse?p=tinc;a=commit;h=7730d5f3ed9bd7c011dced5808130ffcbd7...

This looks like the culprit: http://www.tinc-vpn.org/git/browse?p=tinc;a=commit;h=7730d5f3ed9bd7c011dced5808130ffcbd74ea6b <http://www.tinc-vpn.org/git/browse?p=tinc;a=commit;h=7730d5f3ed9bd7c011dced5808130ffcbd74ea6b> > On Jun 12, 2015, at 3:51 PM, Chris Clements <cclements at outlook.com> wrote: > > Sure, I?ll see if we can narrow it down for you. > > >> On Jun 12, 2015, at 2:25 PM, Etienne Dechamps <etienne at edechamps.fr> wrote: >> >> That's interesting. I'm using a near-HEAD tinc-1.1 myself and haven't >&g...

Have an interesting issue that's cropped up for us. We have a switch based vpn setup with multiple endpoints, some publicly accessible, some behind hide NAT. What we've noticed is that every machine can reach each other's VPN IP's up to a certain packet size. All machines can successfully ping each other up to 297 bytes. At 298 bytes and beyond, only "forwarded"

...#39;m using it in router mode, as opposed to switch mode. I'm trying to narrow this down to a recent commit, but I can't find anything obvious. Did you have a working setup with a previous tinc-1.1 version? Do you have time to try a git bisect? On 11 June 2015 at 23:17, Chris Clements <cclements at outlook.com> wrote: > Have an interesting issue that's cropped up for us. We have a switch based vpn setup with multiple endpoints, some publicly accessible, some behind hide NAT. What we've noticed is that every machine can reach each other's VPN IP's up to a certain pac...

The current 1.1 windows build post to the site is quite old. Would it be possible to post a new official build when convenient? Thanks! Chris