search for: ccamezbg

Hi Bill, > I'm trying it on 4.0. On 4.2, I'm getting this problem during bootstrapping: > > ccAMeZbg.s:111:non-relocatable subtraction expression, > "___gxx_personality_v0" minus "L0" > ccAMeZbg.s:111:symbol: "___gxx_personality_v0" can't be undefined in a > subtraction expression this is the darwin assembler that barfs, right? It looks like it doesn...

...; well darwin/x86 is doing these days? If there are no regressions from > > turning this on by default, we should do it. :) > > > I'm assuming that this is 4.2? :-) I'll give it a try. > I'm trying it on 4.0. On 4.2, I'm getting this problem during bootstrapping: ccAMeZbg.s:111:non-relocatable subtraction expression, "___gxx_personality_v0" minus "L0" ccAMeZbg.s:111:symbol: "___gxx_personality_v0" can't be undefined in a subtraction expression for this reduced testcase: namespace __cxxabiv1 { extern "C" void *__cxa_all...

On 8/24/07, Chris Lattner <sabre at nondot.org> wrote: > > so how about turning it on? > > It sounds good, but I'm concerned about darwin/x86. Bill, can you see how > well darwin/x86 is doing these days? If there are no regressions from > turning this on by default, we should do it. :) > I'm assuming that this is 4.2? :-) I'll give it a try. -bw

Hi Duncan, > > I'm trying it on 4.0. On 4.2, I'm getting this problem during bootstrapping: > > > > ccAMeZbg.s:111:non-relocatable subtraction expression, > > "___gxx_personality_v0" minus "L0" > > ccAMeZbg.s:111:symbol: "___gxx_personality_v0" can't be undefined in a > > subtraction expression > > this is the darwin assembler that barfs, right? I...

On 24 Aug 2007, at 22:11, Duncan Sands wrote: > Hi Bill, > >> I'm trying it on 4.0. On 4.2, I'm getting this problem during >> bootstrapping: >> >> ccAMeZbg.s:111:non-relocatable subtraction expression, >> "___gxx_personality_v0" minus "L0" >> ccAMeZbg.s:111:symbol: "___gxx_personality_v0" can't be undefined >> in a >> subtraction expression > > this is the darwin assembler that barfs, r...