search for: cc_

Hi, > I believe the LowerCall is doing what it needs to do - passing pointer either on the stack or in register as per ABI. >From very quick test-cases with no understanding of XCore, that looks plausible. > LowerFormalArguments () calls CCInfo.AnalyzeFormalArguments(Ins, CC_XCore), which calls the CC_XCore(). > This is where I placed the CCIfByVal<CCPassByVal<0,4>> which only pushed the pointer to the stack. Really, all it did was ask LowerCall and LowerFormalArguments to pass the pointer on the stack (well, strictly "ByVal") as they see fit....

Hi Tim, Thank you for the input. I think I follow you. I believe the LowerCall is doing what it needs to do - passing pointer either on the stack or in register as per ABI. The LowerFormalArguments() is where I am stuck. LowerFormalArguments () calls CCInfo.AnalyzeFormalArguments(Ins, CC_XCore), which calls the CC_XCore(). This is where I placed the CCIfByVal<CCPassByVal<0,4>> which only pushed the pointer to the stack. However, I don't want to push the pointer to the stack but COPY the pointee. Indeed, I want to keep the pointer where it is BUT re-point it to a new...

...me as the one that get's cc'ed?? I could see > where if the messages were forwarded to a different email account, it > would do this. If this is not the case, go into > edit->preferences->advanced-config->config editor (like the about:config > in firefox) and search for cc_ and see if any of those variables are > turned on. > Nothing, there, and looking for reply, I see mailnews.reply_to_self_check_all_ident;false mark > Nataraj > > On 04/27/2018 10:51 AM, m.roth at 5-cent.us wrote: >> incoming-centos at rjl.com wrote: >>> On 04/2...

incoming-centos at rjl.com wrote: > On 04/27/2018 07:55 AM, m.roth at 5-cent.us wrote: >> Does anyone know if it's even possible to NOT cc myself when I hit reply >> all? >> >> Geez, that's what's in the sent folder.... > > Check your settings for account setting->copies & folders->cc these > email addresses > > When I do a

...e's frame Hi, > I believe the LowerCall is doing what it needs to do - passing pointer either on the stack or in register as per ABI. >From very quick test-cases with no understanding of XCore, that looks plausible. > LowerFormalArguments () calls CCInfo.AnalyzeFormalArguments(Ins, CC_XCore), which calls the CC_XCore(). > This is where I placed the CCIfByVal<CCPassByVal<0,4>> which only pushed the pointer to the stack. Really, all it did was ask LowerCall and LowerFormalArguments to pass the pointer on the stack (well, strictly "ByVal") as they see fit....

...s exactly the same as the one that get's cc'ed?? I could see where if the messages were forwarded to a different email account, it would do this. If this is not the case, go into edit->preferences->advanced-config->config editor (like the about:config in firefox) and search for cc_ and see if any of those variables are turned on. Nataraj On 04/27/2018 10:51 AM, m.roth at 5-cent.us wrote: > incoming-centos at rjl.com wrote: >> On 04/27/2018 07:55 AM, m.roth at 5-cent.us wrote: >>> Does anyone know if it's even possible to NOT cc myself when I hit reply...

...FEATURE' == Registered custom function 'FEATUREMAP' == Parsing '/etc/asterisk/enum.conf': Found == Registered application 'CallCompletionRequest' == Registered application 'CallCompletionCancel' [2013-01-10 14:20:10] WARNING[27062]: ccss.c:4278 initialize_cc_max_requests: Could not find valid ccss.conf file. Using cc_max_requests default [2013-01-10 14:20:10] WARNING[27062]: ccss.c:4335 initialize_cc_devstate_map: Could not find valid ccss.conf file. Using cc_[state]_devstate defaults Asterisk Dynamic Loader Starting: == Parsing '/etc/asterisk/mod...

Hi all, newbie question: I am trying to set up a very simple loop without succeeding. Let's say I have monthly observation of two variables for a year - Sales_2012_01, Sales_2012_02, Sales_2012_03, .... (total sales for jan 2012,feb 2012, etc.) - Customers_2012_01, Customers_2012_02, .... (total number of customers for jan 2012, etc.) and I want to create new monthly variables in