Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "cc2c".
Did you mean:
cc2
2007 Dec 23
1
[LLVMdev] [Oink-devel] Status of Elsa->LLVM
...e like you can do
> what you are doing :-).
You guys did a great job!
>
>> It was easy to lower the Elsa AST to LLVM by using Elsa's extension
>> capability.
>
> I'll be pretty interested to see how you did that.
You'll see it soon. But basically think about cc2c. There is now a cc2llvm.
>
>> Does Elsa provide an advantage over g++? For me, understanding it is a
>> big plus. ;-) In addition, Elsa has a Berkeley-like license which I prefer.
>
> Read it more carefully: the license is not just BSD-like, it *is* BSD!
Yes.
>
>>...
2007 Dec 22
0
[LLVMdev] [Oink-devel] Status of Elsa->LLVM
> I've build gcc many times over the years for different target processors
> and was never able to get my head around it internally. It is incredibly
> complex. I also didn't like the fact that I had to have N copies of gcc
> to support N processors.
Scott McPeak is rather familiar with the internals of gcc and edg and
says elsa is far simpler.
> I became interested in
2007 Dec 22
5
[LLVMdev] Status of Elsa->LLVM
Chris Lattner wrote:
> On Dec 21, 2007, at 1:08 PM, Richard Pennington wrote:
>
>> I'm a little further along now. I've started to put together a simple
>> driver for Elsa and LLVM that I'm calling "ellsif" (cute name, I think
>> it works).
>>
>> The file being compiled is a "printf" function. Here are timing
>> results