Displaying 8 results from an estimated 8 matches for "cbidx".
Did you mean:
cb_idx
2013 Feb 08
1
[PATCH linux-next] xen/multicall: xen_mc_callback(): avoid buffer overflow
...ulticalls.c b/arch/x86/xen/multicalls.c
index 0d82003..5270407 100644
--- a/arch/x86/xen/multicalls.c
+++ b/arch/x86/xen/multicalls.c
@@ -195,9 +195,10 @@ void xen_mc_callback(void (*fn)(void *), void *data)
struct mc_buffer *b = &__get_cpu_var(mc_buffer);
struct callback *cb;
- if (b->cbidx == MC_BATCH) {
+ if (b->cbidx >= MC_BATCH) {
trace_xen_mc_flush_reason(XEN_MC_FL_CALLBACK);
xen_mc_flush();
+ return;
}
trace_xen_mc_callback(fn, data);
--
1.7.9.5
2013 Feb 08
1
[PATCH linux-next] xen/multicall: xen_mc_callback(): avoid buffer overflow
...ulticalls.c b/arch/x86/xen/multicalls.c
index 0d82003..5270407 100644
--- a/arch/x86/xen/multicalls.c
+++ b/arch/x86/xen/multicalls.c
@@ -195,9 +195,10 @@ void xen_mc_callback(void (*fn)(void *), void *data)
struct mc_buffer *b = &__get_cpu_var(mc_buffer);
struct callback *cb;
- if (b->cbidx == MC_BATCH) {
+ if (b->cbidx >= MC_BATCH) {
trace_xen_mc_flush_reason(XEN_MC_FL_CALLBACK);
xen_mc_flush();
+ return;
}
trace_xen_mc_callback(fn, data);
--
1.7.9.5
2007 Oct 12
10
[PATCH 00/10] REVIEW: Xen patches for 2.6.24
This is my current set of updates to Xen for 2.6.24. This is largely
a bugfix set, and a couple of them are also relevent to 2.6.23.
These are in the pre-x86 merge form; I'll update them once the merge
goes into git.
Quick overview:
- remove some dead code in arch/i386/mm/init.c
- clean up some duplicate includes
- when sending an IPI, yield the vcpu if the destination doesn't have
2007 Oct 12
10
[PATCH 00/10] REVIEW: Xen patches for 2.6.24
This is my current set of updates to Xen for 2.6.24. This is largely
a bugfix set, and a couple of them are also relevent to 2.6.23.
These are in the pre-x86 merge form; I'll update them once the merge
goes into git.
Quick overview:
- remove some dead code in arch/i386/mm/init.c
- clean up some duplicate includes
- when sending an IPI, yield the vcpu if the destination doesn't have
2007 Oct 12
10
[PATCH 00/10] REVIEW: Xen patches for 2.6.24
This is my current set of updates to Xen for 2.6.24. This is largely
a bugfix set, and a couple of them are also relevent to 2.6.23.
These are in the pre-x86 merge form; I'll update them once the merge
goes into git.
Quick overview:
- remove some dead code in arch/i386/mm/init.c
- clean up some duplicate includes
- when sending an IPI, yield the vcpu if the destination doesn't have
2007 Oct 15
13
[PATCH 00/12] xen/paravirt_ops patches for 2.6.24
Hi Linus,
Here's a set of patches to update paravirt_ops and Xen for 2.6.24
A quick overview of the patchset:
paravirt_ops:
Remove the monolithic paravirt_ops structure, and replace it with
smaller structures of related functions. Also, clean up the handling
of lazy mode to make it easier to implement.
x86/mm/init.c: remove a chunk of dead code
Xen:
- remove duplicate includes
-
2007 Oct 15
13
[PATCH 00/12] xen/paravirt_ops patches for 2.6.24
Hi Linus,
Here's a set of patches to update paravirt_ops and Xen for 2.6.24
A quick overview of the patchset:
paravirt_ops:
Remove the monolithic paravirt_ops structure, and replace it with
smaller structures of related functions. Also, clean up the handling
of lazy mode to make it easier to implement.
x86/mm/init.c: remove a chunk of dead code
Xen:
- remove duplicate includes
-
2007 Oct 15
13
[PATCH 00/12] xen/paravirt_ops patches for 2.6.24
Hi Linus,
Here's a set of patches to update paravirt_ops and Xen for 2.6.24
A quick overview of the patchset:
paravirt_ops:
Remove the monolithic paravirt_ops structure, and replace it with
smaller structures of related functions. Also, clean up the handling
of lazy mode to make it easier to implement.
x86/mm/init.c: remove a chunk of dead code
Xen:
- remove duplicate includes
-