search for: cb_dirti

Signed-off-by: Ilia Mirkin <imirkin at alum.mit.edu> --- src/gallium/drivers/nouveau/nv50/nv50_context.c | 22 ++++++++++++++++++- src/gallium/drivers/nouveau/nv50/nv50_context.h | 1 + src/gallium/drivers/nouveau/nv50/nv50_vbo.c | 29 ++++++++++++++++++++++++- 3 files changed, 50 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/gallium/drivers/nouveau/nv50/nv50_context.c

Signed-off-by: Ilia Mirkin <imirkin at alum.mit.edu> --- src/gallium/drivers/nouveau/nouveau_buffer.c | 4 +--- src/gallium/drivers/nouveau/nouveau_context.h | 1 - 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/gallium/drivers/nouveau/nouveau_buffer.c b/src/gallium/drivers/nouveau/nouveau_buffer.c index e308ff4..904e2cc 100644 ---

In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch cases where we are expecting to fall through. Warning level 3 was used: -Wimplicit-fallthrough=3 Notice that, in some cases, the code comment is modified in accordance with what GCC is expecting to find. This patch is part of the ongoing efforts to enable -Wimplicit-fallthrough. Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo at

This logic is borrowed from the radeon code. The transfer logic will only get called for PIPE_BUFFER resources, so it shouldn't be necessary to worry about them becoming render targets. Signed-off-by: Ilia Mirkin <imirkin at alum.mit.edu> --- A user reported a ~30% FPS improvement with an earlier version of this patch in TF2, and no visual regressions in CS, all on a nv50 card. (Source

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=91310 Bug ID: 91310 Summary: witcher 2 glitches a lot Product: Mesa Version: git Hardware: x86-64 (AMD64) OS: Linux (All) Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: medium Component: Drivers/DRI/nouveau Assignee: nouveau at

On Fri, Feb 15, 2019 at 11:08 AM Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo at embeddedor.com> wrote: > > In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch > cases where we are expecting to fall through. > > Warning level 3 was used: -Wimplicit-fallthrough=3 > > Notice that, in some cases, the code comment is modified > in accordance with what GCC is expecting to find.

--- This is still a WIP. Just wanted to get people's opinions. It's also not bullet-proof. Unfortunately nouveau_bo_wait [which is in turn called by nouveau_bo_map] can trigger a kick, so technically we have to have a lock around any nouveau_bo_map. My strategy here was to add locks around all the user-accessible APIs while leaving all the internal stuff unlocked. When waiting for a