search for: caveated

I'm currently running firmware version 3.2 on my Cisco 7960. I've seen on the list that several people are running the 5.x latest versions. I've avoided going to higher firmware versions because I'm worried about potential problems or issues with the encryption mechanism used in the later firmware versions. (Once you go to an encrypted firmware version, you can't go back,

Are there any caveats to yum upgrade from 4.1 to 4.2? And can someone tell me if perl-5.8.6 is in 4.2? <<JAV>>

Signed-off-by: Gilles Espinasse <g.esp at free.fr> --- scripts/Makefile.host | 2 +- usr/klibc/CAVEATS | 2 +- usr/klibc/README.klibc | 2 +- 3 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/scripts/Makefile.host b/scripts/Makefile.host index d8ab687..6a6b949 100644 --- a/scripts/Makefile.host +++ b/scripts/Makefile.host @@ -5,7 +5,7 @@ # # Both C and C++ is

Hi, I wonder if someone can help me. I have built a gam model to predict the presence of cold water corals and am now trying to evaluate my model by splitting my dataset into training/test datasets. In an ideal world I would use the sample() function to randomly select rows of data for me so for example with 936 rows of data in my HH dataset I might say ss <- sample(nrow(HH), size =

I have a partition that is formatted as ext3 however, due to apparent performance issues (not sure if they are related to journaling - data=ordered, BTW) I have mounted this file system as ext2. The file system was clean when it was shutdown, and has been cleanly mounted as ext2, and I currently have no problems with the partition. My question is, is there any harm in mounting this partition as

Hi, TL;DR: Is it ok to allow numeric variables used on same line as defined except for CHECK-NOT and with false negatives? FileCheck does not currently allow a numeric variable from being used on the same line they were defined. I have a tentative patch to add that support but it comes with caveats so before going through review I'd like to get consensus on whether those caveats are

Classification: UNCLASSIFIED Caveats: NONE Thanks for your quick response. The program you mentioned below available from R is based on number of runs (up or down) not based on a longest length of runs of same events. To be more specific, for example, from a series, HHTHTTTTHHH, the number of runs are 5, and the longest length of runs of the same events is 4. I'll check for the website you

Hai, >From the logs. > ads_krb5_mk_req: krb5_cc_get_principal failed (No such file or > directory) kerberos_kinit_password THIS$@HIJ.KLM.COM failed: Cannot > contact any KDC for requested realm > ads_connect: Cannot contact any KDC for requested realm Join to domain > is not valid: No logon servers return code = -1 In your krb5.conf ad.hij.klm.com does that exist in the

Before addressing the CHECK-NOT case, I’m still unclear about the DAG case. What should the first DAG line match? The regex matching would first attempt to match “10 12” but the expression evaluation would fail; so the DAG candidate wouldn’t match; does this mean the DAG matching does not continue searching, and the test fails? Or would we restart the search…. where? With “0 12” (skipping only

I'm forwarding this to llvmdev so it doesn't get lost in the sea of commits... -Dave ---------- Forwarded Message ---------- Subject: Re: [llvm-commits] [llvm] r48521 - in /llvm/trunk: include/llvm/CodeGen/LiveVariables.h lib/CodeGen/LiveVariables.cpp test/CodeGen/PowerPC/2008-03-18-RegScavengerAssert.ll test/CodeGen/X86/x86-64-ret0.ll

For many months I've been trying to replace a Samba 3.0 Domain Controller with a version that will support Windows 7. Despite advice on Samba HOWTO that all supported versions will support Windows 7 there seems to be an unstated caveat, namely that it must be configured as an Active Directory Domain Controller. Microsoft's own advice is that Windows 7 will not work with a Windows NT

That's actually a very good suggestion. First I figured that in this way files changed within the hour after creation would be ignored, but they probably represent a very small minority anyway. On the other hand, this does not really rectify the situation, but will allow us to postpone the real sync again until, let's say a holiday, where we have plenty of time to sync. Rgds, Bart

Any kind of variable definition on a CHECK-NOT line would seem like it would be asking for trouble. Do we allow text variable definitions on a NOT? False fails are better than false matches. Given that it will fail on a line where you'd expect a match, or possibly for the line to be skipped, it's a matter of refining the match expression, which is something that you have to do sometimes

Classification: UNCLASSIFIED Caveats: NONE I am new to R and somewhat to Web server programming. I am a Java programmer, however, and have done quite a bit with X3D (extensible 3D) computer graphics. A statistician that I work with is doing multidimensional scaling (MDS) and provides some x,y,z's which I display using X3D. Currently he is using Permap which more than gets the job done

On 18/11/15 18:08, Schuyler Bishop wrote: > When I sent the original note, I had it configured this way: > > [realms] > HIJ.KLM.COM <http://hij.klm.com/> = { > kdc = ad1.hij.klm.com > kdc = ad2.hij.klm.com > admin_server = ad.hij.klm.com > default_domain = hij.klm.com > } > > [domain_realm] > .xyz.hij.klm.com = HIJ.KLM.COM <http://hij.klm.com/> >

Joern Nettingsmeier wrote: > Karl Heyes wrote: > >> On Tue, 2005-04-12 at 14:44, gARetH baBB wrote: >> >>> How is fallback to file actually meant to work ? >> >> >> >> just state a filename within webroot. The server creates a source thread >> so that it interacts with the existing fallback mechanism. No timing >> goes on with the

According to http://www.voip-info.org/wiki/view/Asterisk+cmd+Queue, under the "Notes" section: "Transfers of calls that are answered out of a queue must be done using Asterisk '#' transfers (enabled with the 't' option above). SIP transfers result in the Agent remaining affiliated with the call until its eventual termination, preventing that agent from being

Hi, I am attempting to run the libiconv test-suite using wine and one of the problems I am having is that the executables are not able to find the DLL, even when setting WINEDLLPATH, as in: WINEDLLPATH=../lib/.libs wine .libs/table-to Am I doing something wrong? Thank you, Elizabeth

On Mar 30, 2008, at 11:17 AM, David Greene wrote: > I'm forwarding this to llvmdev so it doesn't get lost in the sea of > commits... reg_iterators are independent of SSA or not. The basic issue is that if you loop over uses or defs of a register, it will return *all* the uses/defs of that register in the current function. If the value is SSA form, it is reasonable to say

On Sunday 30 March 2008 01:30:40 pm Chris Lattner wrote: > On Mar 30, 2008, at 11:17 AM, David Greene wrote: > > I'm forwarding this to llvmdev so it doesn't get lost in the sea of > > commits... > > reg_iterators are independent of SSA or not. The basic issue is that > if you loop over uses or defs of a register, it will return *all* the > uses/defs of that