search for: cautioning

Voicemail works fine for me. Post console output here to let us know what went wrong. Cheers, Dean -----Original Message----- From: asterisk-users-bounces@lists.digium.com [mailto:asterisk-users-bounces@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of John Breeden Sent: Friday, March 25, 2005 12:55 PM To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: CAUTION: Re: [Asterisk-Users] grandstream

I have an approved target independent putback and i've run all that we have at Mips as well as on x86 " make TEST=simple" Is there anything else that is easy to run that I can do before doing the commit? The patch touches a number of basic classes so I'm just trying to err on the side of caution.

----- Original Message Header ----- Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/5] tun: vringfd xmit support. From: rusty at rustcorp.com.au; To: akpm at linux-foundation.org; Cc: netdev at vger.kernel.org; maxk at qualcomm.com; virtualization at lists.linux-foundation.org; linux-kernel at vger.kernel.org; ----------------------------------- Warning: Attachment contains virus code or meets the filtering/blocking

FYI to llvmdev. This is a huge win for LLVM. Thanks Reid! -Chris -- http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu/ http://www.nondot.org/~sabre/Projects/ ---------- Forwarded message ---------- Date: Sun, 04 Jul 2004 05:26:34 -0700 From: Reid Spencer <reid at x10sys.com> To: llvm-commits at cs.uiuc.edu Subject: [llvm-commits] CAUTION: Type != Value LLVMers, I have committed one of the major changes on the

Anyone besides me totally throw (most) caution into the wind and yum update any mission critical production 4.x boxen to 4.5 without any problems? 8-p - rh -- Abba Communications Spokane, WA www.abbacomm.net

On Sat, Dec 15, 2012 at 12:33 PM, Reed Kotler <rkotler at mips.com> wrote: > I have an approved target independent putback and i've run all that we > have at Mips as well as on x86 " make TEST=simple" > > Is there anything else that is easy to run that I can do before doing the > commit? > > The patch touches a number of basic classes so I'm just

https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nautilus/+bug/188361 says that at least some version of Nautilus followed symlinks when deleting. Whoopsie!

This is information that might be useful to others, as it drove me nuts until I could figure it out what I did incorrectly. I recently installed the 3.0beta and moved everything from 2.2.8a. I'm still in testing mode, so I rejoined the domain the the few test machines, and have been deleting and rebuilding test user profiles as I check things out. The problem I had occurred with the

For those of you who are going to do the update from the centos5 beta to centos 5 proper despite the warnings, this is a(n incomplete) list of instructions for how to accomplish this 1. Get yourself into runlevel 3 (telinit 3 from terminal) as the dbus update will die if you're in X. 2. Setenforce 0 # turn off selinux as there have been some unconfirmed reports that it will interfere with the

Vladimir, As you noted, the cast to Value* from (I presume) Type* is now invalid as there is no inheritance relationship. You can give a type a name by converting: Ty->setName(Name, &ST) to: ST.insert(Name, Ty) Hope that helps. Reid. On Sat, 2004-07-10 at 07:01, Vladimir Merzliakov wrote: > In VMCore/Module.cpp i found line (254): > > ((Value*)Ty)->setName(Name,

> As you noted, the cast to Value* from (I presume) Type* is now invalid > as there is no inheritance relationship. You can give a type a name by > converting: > > Ty->setName(Name, &ST) > > to: > > ST.insert(Name, Ty) > > Hope that helps. This is resolve problem for me. Is attached patch ok for llvm/lib/VMCore/Module.cpp ? Vladimir --------------

I have just been bitten by a quirk in the behaviour of model.matrix. I used model.matrix inside a function, and passed to it a formula that was built elsewhere. The formula was of the form ``y ~ x + w + z''. Now, model.matrix cheerfully accepts formulae of this form, although it only ***needs*** the right hand side, i.e. ``~ x + w + z'' --- the ``y'' can be dropped (but

In VMCore/Module.cpp i found line (254): ((Value*)Ty)->setName(Name, &ST); Type is not Value now and for me this code call llvm::DerivedType::addAbstractTypeUser (I think it have same index in Type VMT in as setName in Value VMT) with random argument values and terminated with assert fail: Assertion failed: (isAbstract() && "addAbstractTypeUser: Current type not

2 days ago, I posted my long message about the observed slowdown in a package between R-2.15.0 and R-2.15.2. Uwe Ligges urged me to make a self-contained R example. That was the encouragement I needed. I tracked the problem down to a failing use of a LAPACK routine. R's LAPACK C interface changed one variable in one function. But it turned out to be an important change. In case others have

David Shaw wrote: > > At the risk of getting flamed, you yourself have often told people to > 'rm -rf ~/.wine' :-) > > David Shaw When I entered 'rm -rf ~/.wine' it says: rm: /Users/christopherwelch/.wine/drive_c/Program Files/Inbox Toolbar: Permission denied rm: /Users/christopherwelch/.wine/drive_c/Program Files: Directory not empty rm:

Jim Perrin wrote: > For those of you who are going to do the update from the centos5 beta > to centos 5 proper despite the warnings, this is a(n incomplete) list > of instructions for how to accomplish this > > 1. Get yourself into runlevel 3 (telinit 3 from terminal) as the dbus > update will die if you're in X. > 2. Setenforce 0 # turn off selinux as there have been

On Thu, 22 Feb 2018, Pete Biggs wrote: > > > > > finally, any concerns i should have about upgrading the kernel from > > 3.10 to 4.14 or 4.15, as explained in a number of places like this: > > > > https://www.tecmint.com/install-upgrade-kernel-version-in-centos-7/ > > > > i simply prefer to run a current kernel but i can resist the > >

Hi, after upgrading with yum upgrade my server doesn?t boot with kernel 2.6.9-42.0.2.plus.c4 d. Kernel CentOS-4 x86_64 (2.6.9-34.EL) works just fine. I use 2 HDD as RAID1. Unfortunaly this is a root server so i do not have any console output. This is rather disappointing cause i run mission critical applications on the server. I guess the updates should be used with more caution. Regards,

On Thu, 22 Feb 2018, hw wrote: > Robert P. J. Day wrote: ... snip ... > > oh, i appreciate the need for caution; on the other hand, it > > always struck me that the training room is the *ideal* place for > > students to experiment with things they're too nervous or unsure > > of to try back at the office. this is typically why, when i'm > >

On 12/15/2012 12:53 PM, Chandler Carruth wrote: > On Sat, Dec 15, 2012 at 12:33 PM, Reed Kotler <rkotler at mips.com > <mailto:rkotler at mips.com>> wrote: > > I have an approved target independent putback and i've run all > that we have at Mips as well as on x86 " make TEST=simple" > > Is there anything else that is easy to run that I