search for: caution

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 1265 matches for "caution".

2005 Mar 25
0
CAUTION: Re: grandstream firmware update 1.0.5.23
...et us know what went wrong. Cheers, Dean -----Original Message----- From: asterisk-users-bounces@lists.digium.com [mailto:asterisk-users-bounces@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of John Breeden Sent: Friday, March 25, 2005 12:55 PM To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: CAUTION: Re: [Asterisk-Users] grandstream firmware update 1.0.5.23 CAUTION: voicemail screwed up for me (garbled) with upgrade to 23, went back to .22 and all is well. Don't know why, I'll look at it later. dean collins wrote: >Version 1.0.5.23 is now available from http://gs-firmware.grati...
2012 Dec 15
3
[LLVMdev] test-suite
...proved target independent putback and i've run all that we have at Mips as well as on x86 " make TEST=simple" Is there anything else that is easy to run that I can do before doing the commit? The patch touches a number of basic classes so I'm just trying to err on the side of caution.
2008 Apr 25
0
[MailServer Resend] Quarantined email -- use caution when opening.Re: [PATCH 5/5] tun: vringfd xmit support.
...rp.com.au; To: akpm at linux-foundation.org; Cc: netdev at vger.kernel.org; maxk at qualcomm.com; virtualization at lists.linux-foundation.org; linux-kernel at vger.kernel.org; ----------------------------------- Warning: Attachment contains virus code or meets the filtering/blocking rules. Use caution when accessing the contents. -------------- next part -------------- An embedded message was scrubbed... From: Rusty Russell <rusty at rustcorp.com.au> Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/5] tun: vringfd xmit support. Date: Sat, 19 Apr 2008 01:15:15 +1000 Size: 7394 Url: http://lists.linux-foundation.org/...
2004 Jul 04
0
[LLVMdev] [llvm-commits] CAUTION: Type != Value (fwd)
...his is a huge win for LLVM. Thanks Reid! -Chris -- http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu/ http://www.nondot.org/~sabre/Projects/ ---------- Forwarded message ---------- Date: Sun, 04 Jul 2004 05:26:34 -0700 From: Reid Spencer <reid at x10sys.com> To: llvm-commits at cs.uiuc.edu Subject: [llvm-commits] CAUTION: Type != Value LLVMers, I have committed one of the major changes on the way to finishing bug 122: Type no longer derives from Value. My changes have all been committed and they pass 100% of Feature & Regression tests as well as being able to compile llvm-gcc. Please be aware of the followin...
2007 May 21
6
4.5 upgrades on production servers?
Anyone besides me totally throw (most) caution into the wind and yum update any mission critical production 4.x boxen to 4.5 without any problems? 8-p - rh -- Abba Communications Spokane, WA www.abbacomm.net
2012 Dec 15
0
[LLVMdev] test-suite
...ack and i've run all that we > have at Mips as well as on x86 " make TEST=simple" > > Is there anything else that is easy to run that I can do before doing the > commit? > > The patch touches a number of basic classes so I'm just trying to err on > the side of caution. > Your caution is appreciated, but I think you've done plenty at that point. =] I would commit it, and if you're worried, get on IRC to watch the various build bots in case of some failure. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists...
2008 Apr 16
3
Caution when deleting .wine ...
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nautilus/+bug/188361 says that at least some version of Nautilus followed symlinks when deleting. Whoopsie!
2003 Jul 03
0
Caution: "admin users" and roaming profiles
This is information that might be useful to others, as it drove me nuts until I could figure it out what I did incorrectly. I recently installed the 3.0beta and moved everything from 2.2.8a. I'm still in testing mode, so I rejoined the domain the the few test machines, and have been deleting and rebuilding test user profiles as I check things out. The problem I had occurred with the
2007 Apr 12
2
4.92 beta update to centos5 proper words of caution
For those of you who are going to do the update from the centos5 beta to centos 5 proper despite the warnings, this is a(n incomplete) list of instructions for how to accomplish this 1. Get yourself into runlevel 3 (telinit 3 from terminal) as the dbus update will die if you're in X. 2. Setenforce 0 # turn off selinux as there have been some unconfirmed reports that it will interfere with the
2004 Jul 10
0
[LLVMdev] Re: [llvm-commits] CAUTION: Type != Value
Vladimir, As you noted, the cast to Value* from (I presume) Type* is now invalid as there is no inheritance relationship. You can give a type a name by converting: Ty->setName(Name, &ST) to: ST.insert(Name, Ty) Hope that helps. Reid. On Sat, 2004-07-10 at 07:01, Vladimir Merzliakov wrote: > In VMCore/Module.cpp i found line (254): > > ((Value*)Ty)->setName(Name,
2004 Jul 10
1
[LLVMdev] Re: [llvm-commits] CAUTION: Type != Value
> As you noted, the cast to Value* from (I presume) Type* is now invalid > as there is no inheritance relationship. You can give a type a name by > converting: > > Ty->setName(Name, &ST) > > to: > > ST.insert(Name, Ty) > > Hope that helps. This is resolve problem for me. Is attached patch ok for llvm/lib/VMCore/Module.cpp ? Vladimir --------------
2005 Jun 02
2
Caution on the use of model.matrix.
I have just been bitten by a quirk in the behaviour of model.matrix. I used model.matrix inside a function, and passed to it a formula that was built elsewhere. The formula was of the form ``y ~ x + w + z''. Now, model.matrix cheerfully accepts formulae of this form, although it only ***needs*** the right hand side, i.e. ``~ x + w + z'' --- the ``y'' can be dropped (but
2004 Jul 10
3
[LLVMdev] Re: [llvm-commits] CAUTION: Type != Value
In VMCore/Module.cpp i found line (254): ((Value*)Ty)->setName(Name, &ST); Type is not Value now and for me this code call llvm::DerivedType::addAbstractTypeUser (I think it have same index in Type VMT in as setName in Value VMT) with random argument values and terminated with assert fail: Assertion failed: (isAbstract() && "addAbstractTypeUser: Current type not
2012 Dec 14
1
Found explanation for R-2.15.2 slowdown in one case; caution for any users of La_chol
2 days ago, I posted my long message about the observed slowdown in a package between R-2.15.0 and R-2.15.2. Uwe Ligges urged me to make a self-contained R example. That was the encouragement I needed. I tracked the problem down to a failing use of a LAPACK routine. R's LAPACK C interface changed one variable in one function. But it turned out to be an important change. In case others have
2011 May 02
2
Re: Caution when deleting .wine ...
David Shaw wrote: > > At the risk of getting flamed, you yourself have often told people to > 'rm -rf ~/.wine' :-) > > David Shaw When I entered 'rm -rf ~/.wine' it says: rm: /Users/christopherwelch/.wine/drive_c/Program Files/Inbox Toolbar: Permission denied rm: /Users/christopherwelch/.wine/drive_c/Program Files: Directory not empty rm:
2007 Apr 13
1
[Fwd: 4.92 beta update to centos5 proper words of caution]
Jim Perrin wrote: > For those of you who are going to do the update from the centos5 beta > to centos 5 proper despite the warnings, this is a(n incomplete) list > of instructions for how to accomplish this > > 1. Get yourself into runlevel 3 (telinit 3 from terminal) as the dbus > update will die if you're in X. > 2. Setenforce 0 # turn off selinux as there have been
2018 Feb 22
2
a few simple questions about upgrading an "official" centos 7 release
...machines to be as stable and as > standard as possible to the machines the students will find in the > wild. I would definitely not encourage students to upgrade kernels - > novices sysadmins don't need an extra level of uncertainty in their > life! oh, i appreciate the need for caution; on the other hand, it always struck me that the training room is the *ideal* place for students to experiment with things they're too nervous or unsure of to try back at the office. this is typically why, when i'm teaching, i save friday afternoon for trying things that are typically not c...
2006 Sep 01
5
Kernel 2.6.9-42.0.2.plus.c4 doesn´t boot
...-42.0.2.plus.c4 d. Kernel CentOS-4 x86_64 (2.6.9-34.EL) works just fine. I use 2 HDD as RAID1. Unfortunaly this is a root server so i do not have any console output. This is rather disappointing cause i run mission critical applications on the server. I guess the updates should be used with more caution. Regards, Christian
2018 Feb 22
2
a few simple questions about upgrading an "official" centos 7 release
On Thu, 22 Feb 2018, hw wrote: > Robert P. J. Day wrote: ... snip ... > > oh, i appreciate the need for caution; on the other hand, it > > always struck me that the training room is the *ideal* place for > > students to experiment with things they're too nervous or unsure > > of to try back at the office. this is typically why, when i'm > > teaching, i save friday afternoon fo...
2012 Dec 16
1
[LLVMdev] test-suite
...all > that we have at Mips as well as on x86 " make TEST=simple" > > Is there anything else that is easy to run that I can do before > doing the commit? > > The patch touches a number of basic classes so I'm just trying to > err on the side of caution. > > > Your caution is appreciated, but I think you've done plenty at that > point. =] I would commit it, and if you're worried, get on IRC to > watch the various build bots in case of some failure. How do you watch build bots from IRC? -------------- next part ------------...