Displaying 4 results from an estimated 4 matches for "causeof".
Did you mean:
cause
2024 Mar 09
1
kcc_periodic output
I've been grappling with a recurring set of errors for quite some time now:
- UpdateRefs failed with NT_STATUS_IO_TIMEOUT
- Failed samba_kcc - NT_STATUS_IO_TIMEOUT
- IRPC callback failed for DsReplicaSync - NT_STATUS_IO_TIMEOUT
Despite cranking up the log level to 10, the returned information remains
frustratingly cryptic and hard to decipher.
This error, being overly generic, continues to
2024 Mar 10
1
kcc_periodic output
...reveal any problems, yet executing
> thecommand while monitoring the Samba log with "tail -f" exposes
> errorsidenticalto those described above.
> Interestingly, samba-tool drs showrepl doesn't report any errors.
> So, what additional steps can be taken to unearth the root causeof
> these persistent NT_STATUS_IO_TIMEOUT errors?
>
> On Fri, Mar 1, 2024 at 10:32?PM Elias Pereira <empbilly at gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > There is probably nothing wrong with your log, but Firefox doesn't
> > > like it, it thinks it contains a virus.
> >
&g...
2024 Mar 10
1
kcc_periodic output
>
> Is the drepl local processes very busy doing inbound replication?
How can I check this?
My instinct is either the server is very busy (and this should show up in
> CPU use) or a transaction is being held open excessively.
I use VMs on Proxmox. In DC1, I installed the Proxmox agent, and CPU usage
via the dashboard is very low. However, when I checked using 'top,' the
LDAP
2024 Mar 11
1
How to diagnose a busy LDAP server process in the Samba AD DC
...mmand while monitoring the Samba log with "tail
> > > -f" exposes errorsidenticalto those described above.
> > > Interestingly, samba-tool drs showrepl doesn't report any errors.
> > > So, what additional steps can be taken to unearth the root
> > > causeof these persistent NT_STATUS_IO_TIMEOUT errors?
> > >
> > > On Fri, Mar 1, 2024 at 10:32?PM Elias Pereira <empbilly at gmail.com
> > > > wrote:
> > > > There is probably nothing wrong with your log, but Firefox
> > > > doesn't
> > &g...