search for: caueses

Displaying 7 results from an estimated 7 matches for "caueses".

Did you mean: causeses
[PATCH 6/6] virtio_blk: revert QUEUE_FLAG_VIRT addition
2009 Sep 21
0
[PATCH 6/6] virtio_blk: revert QUEUE_FLAG_VIRT addition
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch at lst.de> It seems like the addition of QUEUE_FLAG_VIRT caueses major performance regressions for Fedora users: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509383 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505695 while I can't reproduce those extreme regressions myself I think the flag is wrong. Rationale: QUEUE_FLAG_VIRT expands to QUEUE_FLAG_NONR...
[PATCH] virtio_blk: revert QUEUE_FLAG_VIRT addition
2009 Sep 28
0
[PATCH] virtio_blk: revert QUEUE_FLAG_VIRT addition
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch at lst.de> It seems like the addition of QUEUE_FLAG_VIRT caueses major performance regressions for Fedora users: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509383 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505695 while I can't reproduce those extreme regressions myself I think the flag is wrong. Rationale: QUEUE_FLAG_VIRT expands to QUEUE_FLAG_NONR...
[PATCH 6/6] virtio_blk: revert QUEUE_FLAG_VIRT addition
2009 Sep 21
0
[PATCH 6/6] virtio_blk: revert QUEUE_FLAG_VIRT addition
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch at lst.de> It seems like the addition of QUEUE_FLAG_VIRT caueses major performance regressions for Fedora users: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509383 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505695 while I can't reproduce those extreme regressions myself I think the flag is wrong. Rationale: QUEUE_FLAG_VIRT expands to QUEUE_FLAG_NONR...
[PATCH] virtio_blk: revert QUEUE_FLAG_VIRT addition
2009 Sep 28
0
[PATCH] virtio_blk: revert QUEUE_FLAG_VIRT addition
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch at lst.de> It seems like the addition of QUEUE_FLAG_VIRT caueses major performance regressions for Fedora users: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509383 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505695 while I can't reproduce those extreme regressions myself I think the flag is wrong. Rationale: QUEUE_FLAG_VIRT expands to QUEUE_FLAG_NONR...
[PULL] virtio fixes
2009 Oct 19
1
[PULL] virtio fixes
...1 - 14 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 48 deletions(-) commit d5a01175aa25ef30a99545f09e0a2828a226d3cd Author: Christoph Hellwig <hch at lst.de> Date: Fri Sep 4 22:44:42 2009 +0200 virtio_blk: revert QUEUE_FLAG_VIRT addition It seems like the addition of QUEUE_FLAG_VIRT caueses major performance regressions for Fedora users: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509383 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505695 while I can't reproduce those extreme regressions myself I think the flag is wrong. Rationale:...
[PULL] virtio fixes
2009 Oct 19
1
[PULL] virtio fixes
...1 - 14 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 48 deletions(-) commit d5a01175aa25ef30a99545f09e0a2828a226d3cd Author: Christoph Hellwig <hch at lst.de> Date: Fri Sep 4 22:44:42 2009 +0200 virtio_blk: revert QUEUE_FLAG_VIRT addition It seems like the addition of QUEUE_FLAG_VIRT caueses major performance regressions for Fedora users: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509383 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505695 while I can't reproduce those extreme regressions myself I think the flag is wrong. Rationale:...
No subject
2003 Dec 01
0
No subject
When I try the command nmblookup -M TESTGROUP querying TESTGROUP on 192.168.255.255 name_query failed to find name TESTGROUP #1d My /etc/hosts file is # Do not remove the following line, or various programs # that require network functionality will fail. 127.0.0.1 localhost localhost.localdomain 192.168.100.101 testpc 192.168.100.100 linuxserver /etc/samba/lmhosts is 127.0.0.1 localhost