Displaying 2 results from an estimated 2 matches for "catatrophic".
Did you mean:
catastrophic
2007 Oct 27
1
(PR#10379) Re: x11(....) kills R without DISPLAY
...#39;t find per display information
>>> %
> <snipped>
>>> =20
>> I see this on Fedora 7 too. I suspect that the earlier report was=20
>> thought to be Mac specific.
> <snipped>
>
> I was experimenting with xvfb last week and didn't see the catatrophic =
> problem like that, so I tried again. Is it possible that this has=20
> already been fixed in R 2.6.0 ? (I am on fedora 7, x86_64 as well).
>
> ------------------------------------------
> $ export -n DISPLAY
>
> $ R
> R version 2.6.0 (2007-10-03)
> ...
> > x11(...
2007 Oct 29
1
(PR#10379) Re: x11(....) kills R without DISPLAY
...Linux janus 2.6.22.9-91.fc7 #1 SMP Thu Sep 27 20:47:39 EDT 2007=20
>> x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
>> [pd at janus ~]$ cat /etc/issue
>> Fedora release 7 (Moonshine)
>> Kernel \r on an \m
>
> Agh, sorry. Yes, x11() (with or without $DISPLAY set) doesn't
> die catatrophically, x11("validinfo") does.
>
> HTL
The culprit would seem to be this bit of devX11.c
1302 xtdpy =3D XtOpenDisplay(app_con, NULL, "r_x11",=20
"R_x11",
1303 NULL, 0, &zero, NULL);
1304...