search for: catall

Hello, I am calling the auto.arima method in the forecast package at it returns what seems to be valid Arima output. But when I feed this output to 'predict' I get: Error in predict.Arima(catall.fit[[.index]], n.ahead = 12) : 'xreg' and 'newxreg' have different numbers of columns Is there a way to tell what is being supplied to xreg from the Arima output? Any ideas? Thank you. Kevin

Hi List, I would like to embed some fonts (AFM format) on 324 eps files produced by a R loop, I’m able to do so one-by-one with the following command: embedFonts('C:/Users/Rodrigo/Documents/UFPR/Micropaleontologia/Potiguar/Cata logo/Mapas/EPS/Example.eps', outfile='C:/Users/Rodrigo/Documents/UFPR/Micropaleontologia/Potiguar/Catalog o/Mapas/EPS/Example2.eps',

I was able to compile and run Wine successfully this morning. I can now run WELCOME.EXE, CALC.EXE & NOTEPAD.EXE where I am currently putting windows (non-catalization intentional) programs in /c/windows. I do have a coule of questions however. I get an error saying basically an exported function needed from MSVCRT.DLL is not found, try using the native one instead when running NOTEPAD.EXE

Hey, I have free calling to between DDIs and cellphones on our group plan. I figure it'd be nice to allow staff with those cellphones to be able to forward callers to their VoiceMail to their cellphones using the * feature. I have a standard extension macro that has VoiceMail support. So far I've done this by duplicating the standard extension macro, and adding this rule (where ARG1 is

Hi, I'm trying to compile ocfs2 1.2.6 on a 2.6.21 kernel (with rsbac and pax patches), but I can't get this to work .. In 2.6.20 there was an change in the definition of the INIT_WORK macro (http://lkml.org/lkml/2006/12/5/269) this seems to cause my problems (see below) but even after removing the third parameter of the INIT_WORK calls the compile fails (see second compile failure). Can

Hola, ¿qué tal? Escribo en esta lista para recabar la ayuda de socios de la asociación y la comunidad de usuarios de R. Resulta que el nombre de la asociación que se eligió originariamente, "Comunidad de Usuarios de R", ha sido rechazada por el registro español de asociaciones a instancias del Ministerio de Sanidad, Servicios Sociales e Igualdad (¡nada menos!) por incumplir el artículo