Displaying 13 results from an estimated 13 matches for "casuses".
Did you mean:
casues
2010 Sep 29
4
DAHDI FXO port only recognizes the "S" extension
...'UNKNOWN'
-- Hungup 'DAHDI/1-1'
But if I changed the "_X." to "S" extension, I can get the whole thing to work well:
[from-pstn]
exten =>s,1,Answer()
exten =>s,n,Wait(1)
exten =>s,n,Dial(DAHDI/3)
exten =>s,n,Hangup
Would you please let me which casuses this issue?
Thanks,
Songtao Yu
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20100929/f2111a16/attachment.htm
2020 Oct 08
0
Mail server troubles
On Thu, 8 Oct 2020 at 17:50, Nicolas Kovacs <info at microlinux.fr> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> This is probably a bit OT, but here goes.
>
> I've been running our local school's mail server since 2013, with mail
> addresses for school staff and some teachers. The server is running CentOS
> 7
> with Postfix and Dovecot, and it's a nice no-bullshit configuration with
2020 Oct 08
6
Mail server troubles
Hi,
This is probably a bit OT, but here goes.
I've been running our local school's mail server since 2013, with mail
addresses for school staff and some teachers. The server is running CentOS 7
with Postfix and Dovecot, and it's a nice no-bullshit configuration with SPF,
DKIM and DMARC.
The school sends quite a lot of email out to parents, and sometimes, mail gets
rejected:
2009 Sep 21
0
[PATCH 6/6] virtio_blk: revert QUEUE_FLAG_VIRT addition
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch at lst.de>
It seems like the addition of QUEUE_FLAG_VIRT caueses major performance
regressions for Fedora users:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509383
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505695
while I can't reproduce those extreme regressions myself I think the flag
is wrong.
Rationale:
QUEUE_FLAG_VIRT expands to
2009 Sep 28
0
[PATCH] virtio_blk: revert QUEUE_FLAG_VIRT addition
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch at lst.de>
It seems like the addition of QUEUE_FLAG_VIRT caueses major performance
regressions for Fedora users:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509383
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505695
while I can't reproduce those extreme regressions myself I think the flag
is wrong.
Rationale:
QUEUE_FLAG_VIRT expands to
2009 Sep 21
0
[PATCH 6/6] virtio_blk: revert QUEUE_FLAG_VIRT addition
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch at lst.de>
It seems like the addition of QUEUE_FLAG_VIRT caueses major performance
regressions for Fedora users:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509383
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505695
while I can't reproduce those extreme regressions myself I think the flag
is wrong.
Rationale:
QUEUE_FLAG_VIRT expands to
2009 Sep 28
0
[PATCH] virtio_blk: revert QUEUE_FLAG_VIRT addition
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch at lst.de>
It seems like the addition of QUEUE_FLAG_VIRT caueses major performance
regressions for Fedora users:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509383
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505695
while I can't reproduce those extreme regressions myself I think the flag
is wrong.
Rationale:
QUEUE_FLAG_VIRT expands to
2023 Nov 09
1
Dependency errors for package pracma
I tried to update my package {pracma} on CRAN from 2.4.2 (2022-09-21)
to version 2.4.4 (2023-11-08). This package reverse depends / imports
/ suggests on 350 packages on CRAN and 25 packages on Bioconductor.
The only changes are small corrections on some help files, a new
function for stereographic projection, and `gcd` and `Lcm` require
integer inputs now (these functions are not used in the
2020 Oct 09
2
Mail server troubles
On 9/10/20 11:08 am, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
> On Thu, 8 Oct 2020 at 17:50, Nicolas Kovacs <info at microlinux.fr> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> This is probably a bit OT, but here goes.
>>
>> I've been running our local school's mail server since 2013, with mail
>> addresses for school staff and some teachers. The server is running CentOS
2009 Oct 19
1
[PULL] virtio fixes
(Sorry for delay, recent absences, but all been in linux-next a week now)
The following changes since commit 2fdc246aaf9a7fa088451ad2a72e9119b5f7f029:
Linus Torvalds (1):
Merge branch 'for-linus' of git://git.kernel.org/.../bp/bp
are available in the git repository at:
ssh://master.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/rusty/linux-2.6-for-linus.git master
Christian
2009 Oct 19
1
[PULL] virtio fixes
(Sorry for delay, recent absences, but all been in linux-next a week now)
The following changes since commit 2fdc246aaf9a7fa088451ad2a72e9119b5f7f029:
Linus Torvalds (1):
Merge branch 'for-linus' of git://git.kernel.org/.../bp/bp
are available in the git repository at:
ssh://master.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/rusty/linux-2.6-for-linus.git master
Christian
2016 Jul 21
3
Re: How to debug supermin5 issue?
At 2016-07-21 19:52:11, "Pino Toscano" <ptoscano@redhat.com> wrote:
>On Thursday, 21 July 2016 18:50:52 CEST Chen Hanxiao wrote:
>>
>> At 2016-07-21 18:43:04, "Richard W.M. Jones" <rjones@redhat.com> wrote:
>> >On Thu, Jul 21, 2016 at 06:36:20PM +0800, Chen Hanxiao wrote:
>> >> the virtio modules in kmods did existed in this
2006 May 23
2
samba domain controller
I tried to post this in the debian group, but my mail never appeared there..
Am attempting to do a test install of samba as a primary domain
controller. I can see the shares and navigate them.
However, when I attempt to join the domain, WinXP says "username could
not be found".
I have a root user with a password. I can see it's shares as well if I
use the root name and password.
So