search for: casus

...'UNKNOWN' -- Hungup 'DAHDI/1-1' But if I changed the "_X." to "S" extension, I can get the whole thing to work well: [from-pstn] exten =>s,1,Answer() exten =>s,n,Wait(1) exten =>s,n,Dial(DAHDI/3) exten =>s,n,Hangup Would you please let me which casuses this issue? Thanks, Songtao Yu -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20100929/f2111a16/attachment.htm

...il with that content is getting blocked. I don't know if the school moving to another provider will fix that as this isn't because of the IP it was sent from (they block before the DATA is sent in that case). [My guess is that someone wants to move to something else and is using this as the Casus Belli to do so. ] I don't really have a suggestion or solution to either problem.. > -- Stephen J Smoogen.

Hi, This is probably a bit OT, but here goes. I've been running our local school's mail server since 2013, with mail addresses for school staff and some teachers. The server is running CentOS 7 with Postfix and Dovecot, and it's a nice no-bullshit configuration with SPF, DKIM and DMARC. The school sends quite a lot of email out to parents, and sometimes, mail gets rejected:

...rformance regressions for Fedora users: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509383 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505695 while I can't reproduce those extreme regressions myself I think the flag is wrong. Rationale: QUEUE_FLAG_VIRT expands to QUEUE_FLAG_NONROT which casus the queue unplugged immediately. This is not a good behaviour for at least qemu and kvm where we do have significant overhead for every I/O operations. Even with all the latested speeups (native AIO, MSI support, zero copy) we can only get native speed for up to 128kb I/O requests we al...

...rformance regressions for Fedora users: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509383 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505695 while I can't reproduce those extreme regressions myself I think the flag is wrong. Rationale: QUEUE_FLAG_VIRT expands to QUEUE_FLAG_NONROT which casus the queue unplugged immediately. This is not a good behaviour for at least qemu and kvm where we do have significant overhead for every I/O operations. Even with all the latested speeups (native AIO, MSI support, zero copy) we can only get native speed for up to 128kb I/O requests we al...

...rformance regressions for Fedora users: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509383 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505695 while I can't reproduce those extreme regressions myself I think the flag is wrong. Rationale: QUEUE_FLAG_VIRT expands to QUEUE_FLAG_NONROT which casus the queue unplugged immediately. This is not a good behaviour for at least qemu and kvm where we do have significant overhead for every I/O operations. Even with all the latested speeups (native AIO, MSI support, zero copy) we can only get native speed for up to 128kb I/O requests we al...

...rformance regressions for Fedora users: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509383 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505695 while I can't reproduce those extreme regressions myself I think the flag is wrong. Rationale: QUEUE_FLAG_VIRT expands to QUEUE_FLAG_NONROT which casus the queue unplugged immediately. This is not a good behaviour for at least qemu and kvm where we do have significant overhead for every I/O operations. Even with all the latested speeups (native AIO, MSI support, zero copy) we can only get native speed for up to 128kb I/O requests we al...

I tried to update my package {pracma} on CRAN from 2.4.2 (2022-09-21) to version 2.4.4 (2023-11-08). This package reverse depends / imports / suggests on 350 packages on CRAN and 25 packages on Bioconductor. The only changes are small corrections on some help files, a new function for stereographic projection, and `gcd` and `Lcm` require integer inputs now (these functions are not used in the

...ntent is getting blocked. I don't know if the school moving to > another provider will fix that as this isn't because of the IP it was sent > from (they block before the DATA is sent in that case). [My guess is that > someone wants to move to something else and is using this as the Casus > Belli to do so. ] > > I don't really have a suggestion or solution to either problem.. > If this reject is due to their spam filtering process, it is actually the email author's problem - how they make up their sentences, key words etc. and thus the problem will travel with...

...https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509383 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505695 while I can't reproduce those extreme regressions myself I think the flag is wrong. Rationale: QUEUE_FLAG_VIRT expands to QUEUE_FLAG_NONROT which casus the queue unplugged immediately. This is not a good behaviour for at least qemu and kvm where we do have significant overhead for every I/O operations. Even with all the latested speeups (native AIO, MSI support, zero copy) we can only get native speed for up to 128kb...

...https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509383 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505695 while I can't reproduce those extreme regressions myself I think the flag is wrong. Rationale: QUEUE_FLAG_VIRT expands to QUEUE_FLAG_NONROT which casus the queue unplugged immediately. This is not a good behaviour for at least qemu and kvm where we do have significant overhead for every I/O operations. Even with all the latested speeups (native AIO, MSI support, zero copy) we can only get native speed for up to 128kb...

At 2016-07-21 19:52:11, "Pino Toscano" <ptoscano@redhat.com> wrote: >On Thursday, 21 July 2016 18:50:52 CEST Chen Hanxiao wrote: >> >> At 2016-07-21 18:43:04, "Richard W.M. Jones" <rjones@redhat.com> wrote: >> >On Thu, Jul 21, 2016 at 06:36:20PM +0800, Chen Hanxiao wrote: >> >> the virtio modules in kmods did existed in this

I tried to post this in the debian group, but my mail never appeared there.. Am attempting to do a test install of samba as a primary domain controller. I can see the shares and navigate them. However, when I attempt to join the domain, WinXP says "username could not be found". I have a root user with a password. I can see it's shares as well if I use the root name and password. So