search for: cassell

On Mon, May 14, 2018, at 4:52 PM, Stephan Bosch wrote: > > > Op 25/04/2018 om 22:49 schreef James Cassell: > > On Wed, Apr 25, 2018, at 3:20 PM, Stephan Bosch wrote: > >> > >> Specify the ID used for duplicate checking explicitly using the > >> :uniqueid argument (https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7352#section-3.1). > >> Using the variables extenion, compose the u...

On 17/08/2018 09:14, Stephan Bosch wrote: > > > Op 14/05/2018 om 23:03 schreef James Cassell: >> >> On Mon, May 14, 2018, at 4:52 PM, Stephan Bosch wrote: >>> >>> Op 25/04/2018 om 22:49 schreef James Cassell: >>>> On Wed, Apr 25, 2018, at 3:20 PM, Stephan Bosch wrote: >>>>> Specify the ID used for duplicate checking explicitly using...

...compose the uniqueid from the message-id > and the mailbox name. > In my experience with dovecot's implementation, you can set the ID only once in a script. If you try to filter duplicates based on multiple IDs, only the first (or last, I don't remember) takes effect. V/r, James Cassell

I am able to get sieve issuing an "out of office"message correctly. However, I want to configure it to send an "OOO" message only during certain dates, say on weekends, or only between certain hours. I can do that manually; however, was wondering if there is any automatic method available that could handle this chore. Thanks! -- Jerry

Hi, All Thanks to Robert Baskin, Thomas Lumley, and Spencer Graves for the valuable helps. I have learned a lot from this discussion. I put all discussions together without editing, so we can see how things are evolved. Likely, I have a lot of articles to read. As in the discussion, mixed modeling approach is a poosible but may be over-kill in my posted data analyses. I will explore other

Hi, I have recently updated from Dovecot 2.2 to 2.3. Since I have noticed that vacation responses from sieve are not working the same anymore. For example, my sieve script looks like this: vacation :days 1 :addresses ["Kippels at hhu.de","julian.kippels at hhu.de"] it used to be that I got a vacation response if I sent a mail to kippels at hhu.de and Kippels at hhu.de. Now

Op 14/05/2018 om 23:03 schreef James Cassell: > > On Mon, May 14, 2018, at 4:52 PM, Stephan Bosch wrote: >> >> Op 25/04/2018 om 22:49 schreef James Cassell: >>> On Wed, Apr 25, 2018, at 3:20 PM, Stephan Bosch wrote: >>>> Specify the ID used for duplicate checking explicitly using the >>>> :un...

...a bunch of ways of modifying this statement, including an explicit path in this statement. I think that did work, but a similar problem then occurred at a later point that I haven't yet located. Has anyone gotten this installation to work on this platform? Alexa J. M. Sorant NIH/NHGRI 333 Cassell Drive Suite 2000 Baltimore, MD 21224 ajms at mail.nih.gov (410) 550-7512 voice (410) 550-7513 fax

...a bunch of ways of modifying this statement, including an explicit path in this statement. I think that did work, but a similar problem then occurred at a later point that I haven't yet located. Has anyone gotten this installation to work on this platform? Alexa J. M. Sorant NIH/NHGRI 333 Cassell Drive Suite 2000 Baltimore, MD 21224 ajms at mail.nih.gov (410) 550-7512 voice (410) 550-7513 fax

...ome up when trying to move FROM a folder for which the user doesn't have the EXPUNGE ACL. It doesn't have to be a shared folder (and in my case, it is not a shared folder.) My workaround is to not advertise the MOVE capability, but long-term, it's better to fix the crash. V/r, James Cassell

Hello Stephan, Maybe this is not an issue at all and nothing but a curiosity; maybe though you do care: When there is only a local part in "To", the "subaddress" extension does not match on the "detail" part. This happened when I made a device on the LAN send to "name+foo", where "name" is a system account on the computer used as smtp. Such

Op 25/04/2018 om 22:49 schreef James Cassell: > On Wed, Apr 25, 2018, at 3:20 PM, Stephan Bosch wrote: >> >> Specify the ID used for duplicate checking explicitly using the >> :uniqueid argument (https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7352#section-3.1). >> Using the variables extenion, compose the uniqueid from the message-...

Look at the currentdate test https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5260#section-5 V/r, James Cassell On Sat, Jan 5, 2019, at 11:26 AM, Jerry wrote: > I am able to get sieve issuing an "out of office"message correctly. > However, I want to configure it to send an "OOO" message only during > certain dates, say on weekends, or only between certain hours. I can do > t...

...he Vacation RFC, it should fallback to case-insensitive: https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5230 You could try working around the issue by adding to your `vacation` statement: `:comparator "i;ascii-casemap"` -- but in any case, I'd file a bug about the non-standard behavior. V/r, James Cassell > Thanks > Julian > >

Hi all, I'm trying to set an ACL with negative rights. I have no problems setting it with standard IMAP commands, but I'm unable to do it with the doveadm acl command. I tried: sudo -u vmail doveadm acl set -u "user at domain" Spam user="-user at domain" lookup (notice the "-" before the username) Unfortunately, this adds a (positive) ACL for the user

Hello everyone. I have a problem using Dovecot 2.2.26 with ACL plugin and deleting e-mails from a shared mailbox. My user doesn't have the "expunge" permission on the shared mailbox, but it has the "write-deleted" permission. So, when I delete a message from the shared mailbox using a client that implements the IMAP MOVE command, it tries to move the message to my Trash

Hi everyone, we have a duplicate e-mail problem with Dovecot 2.2.13 (LMTP as MDA) on a Debian 8 server. Our users are on external LDAP. We just need to setup a vacation responder (with Sieve) for our employees with a redirect to an alias (a distribution list), let's call it /LIST at domain.com/, that comprehends even the user that just activated the out of office. This generates a

On 23/04/18 14:18, Stephan Bosch wrote: > > > Op 11-4-2018 om 23:58 schreef Andr? Rodier: >> Hello, >> >> I have tested the sieve duplicate script with success so far, but I have >> a question. > > Sieve duplicate script? You mean the Sieve duplicate extension (RFC 7352)? > >> I would like to know if the "duplicate" sieve flag in

Fix several warnings and broken links. This series was generated against linux-next, but was rebased to be applied at docs-next. It should apply cleanly on either tree. There's a git tree with all of them applied on the top of docs/docs-next at: https://git.linuxtv.org/mchehab/experimental.git/log/?h=fix_doc_links_v2 Mauro Carvalho Chehab (21): ABI: sysfs-devices-system-cpu: point to

On Thursday, May 30, 2019 1:23:53 AM CEST Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote: > Mostly due to x86 and acpi conversion, several documentation > links are still pointing to the old file. Fix them. For the Italian documentation I just send I patch to fix them in a dedicated patch > > Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+samsung at kernel.org> > --- >