Displaying 15 results from an estimated 15 matches for "caspy".
Did you mean:
casey
2019 Aug 13
2
Autoexpunge not working for Junk?
On Aug 12, 2019, at 8:54 PM, Thomas Zajic via dovecot <dovecot at dovecot.org> wrote:
>
> * Amir Caspi via dovecot, 12.08.19 22:01
>
>> [~]# doveadm mailbox status -u cepheid firstsaved Junk
>> Junk firstsaved=1563154976
>>
>> I can't tell how that timestamp corresponds to a human-readable date, however.
>
> [zlatko at disclosure:~]$ date -d
2019 Aug 08
2
Autoexpunge not working for Junk?
Hello!
I have the autoexpunge settings defined inside protocol imap thus (and
it works):
protocol imap {
? mail_plugins = quota notify replication imap_quota imap_sieve
? namespace inbox {
??? location =
??? mailbox Ham {
????? autoexpunge = 365 days
??? }
??? mailbox Spam {
????? autoexpunge = 365 days
??? }
??? mailbox Trash {
????? autoexpunge = 180 days
??? }
??? prefix =
? }
2019 Jul 25
3
Autoexpunge not working for Junk?
Hi all,
I set up dovecot a couple of months ago and am having trouble getting autoexpunge=30d to work on my Trash and Junk mailboxes. Not sure why not because I'm not getting error messages in my log.
Running "doveadm search -u <user> mailbox Junk savedbefore 30d" shows me many messages (I've got messages back to mid-May, and a couple of other users have them back to
2019 Aug 14
0
Autoexpunge not working for Junk?
On 13 Aug 2019, at 5.57, Amir Caspi via dovecot <dovecot at dovecot.org> wrote:
>
> On Aug 12, 2019, at 8:54 PM, Thomas Zajic via dovecot <dovecot at dovecot.org> wrote:
>>
>> * Amir Caspi via dovecot, 12.08.19 22:01
>>
>>> [~]# doveadm mailbox status -u cepheid firstsaved Junk
>>> Junk firstsaved=1563154976
>>>
>>> I
2019 Aug 12
2
Autoexpunge not working for Junk?
On Aug 12, 2019, at 12:18 AM, Sami Ketola via dovecot <dovecot at dovecot.org> wrote:
>
> "1. What's the first mail's saved-timestamp?
> doveadm fetch -u user date.saved mailbox Junk 1
Well... this is giving me strange results. For myself, when I run this command, I get:
[~]# doveadm fetch -u cepheid date.saved mailbox Junk 1
date.saved: 2019-07-15 01:42:56
2019 Aug 10
3
Autoexpunge not working for Junk?
On 8 Aug 2019, at 13:03, Amir Caspi <cepheid at 3phase.com> wrote:
> IMHO the setting should apply regardless of protocol, but is that actually the case in practice?
It seems to be broken.
I have
namespace inbox {
inbox = yes
location =
mailbox Drafts {
special_use = \Drafts
}
mailbox Junk {
autoexpunge = 14 days
auto = subscribe
special_use = \Junk
}
?
}
and I have messages in my
2019 Aug 08
0
Autoexpunge not working for Junk?
Hi all,
Might anyone have any idea about this issue? I can run a cron job if needed but it seems like autoexpunge SHOULD be doing this automatically...
Thanks!
--- Amir
> On Jul 24, 2019, at 10:18 PM, Amir Caspi <Cepheid at 3phase.com> wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> I set up dovecot a couple of months ago and am having trouble getting autoexpunge=30d to work on my Trash and
2019 Aug 12
0
Autoexpunge not working for Junk?
> On 10 Aug 2019, at 3.15, @lbutlr via dovecot <dovecot at dovecot.org> wrote:
>
> On 8 Aug 2019, at 13:03, Amir Caspi <cepheid at 3phase.com> wrote:
>> IMHO the setting should apply regardless of protocol, but is that actually the case in practice?
>
> It seems to be broken.
>
> I have
>
> namespace inbox {
> inbox = yes
> location =
>
2019 Aug 13
0
Autoexpunge not working for Junk?
* Amir Caspi via dovecot, 12.08.19 22:01
> [~]# doveadm mailbox status -u cepheid firstsaved Junk
> Junk firstsaved=1563154976
>
> I can't tell how that timestamp corresponds to a human-readable date, however.
[zlatko at disclosure:~]$ date -d @1563154976
Mon Jul 15 03:42:56 CEST 2019
HTH,
Thomas
2019 Aug 14
0
Autoexpunge not working for Junk?
On 14 Aug 2019, at 22.35, Amir Caspi via dovecot <dovecot at dovecot.org> wrote:
>
> On Aug 14, 2019, at 1:26 PM, Timo Sirainen via dovecot <dovecot at dovecot.org <mailto:dovecot at dovecot.org>> wrote:
>>
>> It probably has something to do with using mbox format. Are the IMAP UIDs changing unexpectedly? Errors/warnings logged related to it? Unfortunately
2019 Oct 12
1
Password issue
On Oct 11, 2019, at 7:26 PM, @lbutlr via dovecot <dovecot at dovecot.org> wrote:
>
> setting the explicit port for SMTP and.or IMAP advanced settings didn?t change the port it actually tried connecting go until I removed the account and re-added it.
I'm sure you tried this before deleting/re-adding, but just in case not: you do have to close out of the settings window (or switch
2009 Feb 23
0
Asterisk 1.6.0.6 Now Available!
...ion. The GoogleTalk client discards Asterisk's replies if the
initiator attribute contains uppercase characters.
- Closes issue #13984. Submitted and tested by: jcovert
* Fix odd "thank you" sound playing behavior in app_queue.c
- Closes issue #14227. Reported and tested by: caspy
* Don't do an SRV lookup if a port is specified RFC 3263 says to do A record
lookups on a hostname if a port has been specified, so that's what we're
going to do. See section 4.2.
- Closes issue #14419. Reported and patched by: klaus3000
* Properly set "seen" and &q...
2019 Aug 14
2
Autoexpunge not working for Junk?
On Aug 14, 2019, at 1:26 PM, Timo Sirainen via dovecot <dovecot at dovecot.org> wrote:
>
> It probably has something to do with using mbox format. Are the IMAP UIDs changing unexpectedly? Errors/warnings logged related to it? Unfortunately it's a rather troublesome mailbox format. There are likely some bugs in Dovecot mbox code, but it's difficult and time consuming to try to
2019 Aug 08
0
Autoexpunge not working for Junk?
On Aug 8, 2019, at 12:52 PM, Reio Remma via dovecot <dovecot at dovecot.org> wrote:
>
> I have the autoexpunge settings defined inside protocol imap thus (and it works):
It looks like my definitions are outside the protocol, as this is the default in /etc/dovecot/conf.d/15-mailboxes.conf...
MUST autoexpunge be declared within the imap protocol, even if the mailboxes themselves are
2005 Mar 25
0
ways to get more accuracy from ztdummy
Greetings!
I have a FreeBSD 5.3 running on Intel SR1300 (dual xeon 2.6, scsi) server,
with ztdummy.ko driver as timing source for asterisk.
The typical output from zttest is:
$ zttest
Opened pseudo zap interface, measuring accuracy...
[..skip..]
--- Results after 192 passes ---
Best: 99.987793 -- Worst: 98.266602
But when i listening MOH, it's quality is not very good. It is slightly