search for: casalino93

Le 04/11/20 à 17:40, David Greene a écrit : > Sorry about the late reply. > > Lorenzo Casalino <lorenzo.casalino93 at gmail.com> writes: > >>>>> - Should not impact compile time excessively (what is "excessive?") >>>> Probably, such estimation should be performed on >>> Did something get cut off here? >> Uops. Yep, I removed a paragraph, but, apparentely...

...st time doing so. But maybe it is better to start with Lorenzo's proposal, as you have already been working on this? Please tell me if you prefer me to start the RFC though. Thank you again for keeping this going. Sincerely, - Son On Wed, Nov 4, 2020 at 6:30 PM Lorenzo Casalino < lorenzo.casalino93 at gmail.com> wrote: > > Le 04/11/20 à 17:40, David Greene a écrit : > > Sorry about the late reply. > > > > Lorenzo Casalino <lorenzo.casalino93 at gmail.com> writes: > > > >>>>> - Should not impact compile time excessively (what is "e...

> opt -load lib­dum­my­pass.so -dum­my­pass hel­lo.ll Looks like you are loading a shared library different from "LLVMHello.so". did you change the name of the compilation unit from "Hello.cpp" into "dummypass.cpp"? (As asked previously by Andrzej) did you register the dummy pass? > RegisterPass<DummyPass> X("dummypass",

Am 31/08/20 um 14:10 schrieb David Greene: > Lorenzo Casalino via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> writes: > >> Furthermore, after register allocation there is a non-negligible effort >> to properly annotate instructions which share the same output register... >> >> Concerning the usage of the live ranges to tie annotated instruction and >> intrinsic,

Am 08/09/20 um 17:57 schrieb David Greene: > Lorenzo Casalino <lorenzo.casalino93 at gmail.com> writes: > >> Am 31/08/20 um 14:10 schrieb David Greene: >>> Lorenzo Casalino via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> writes: >>> >>>> Furthermore, after register allocation there is a non-negligible effort >>>> to properly...