search for: carlborg

...39;t matter if it's a tag or a branch, but, as far as I can see, there are no branches for point releases. For example, there's a branch release_50, but no branch for release_501, which exists in the Subversion repository. [1] https://github.com/llvm-mirror/llvm/branches/all -- /Jacob Carlborg

This is strange and everything is fast for me. Let's continue off-list. On Wed, Jan 17, 2018 at 8:13 PM, Jacob Carlborg via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > On 2018-01-17 12:29, Anton Korobeynikov via llvm-dev wrote: >> >> Which URL ? > > > They all seem to be slow. But here's one example: > > https://releases.llvm.org/4.0.0/clang+llvm-4.0.0-x86_64-linux-gnu-ubun...

On 2018-01-17 12:29, Anton Korobeynikov via llvm-dev wrote: > Which URL ? They all seem to be slow. But here's one example: https://releases.llvm.org/4.0.0/clang+llvm-4.0.0-x86_64-linux-gnu-ubuntu-14.04.tar.xz -- /Jacob Carlborg

...status here? Can someone keep https://llvm.org/docs/Proposals/GitHubMove.html updated with the current status of things? And once things are usable, probably update https://llvm.org/docs/GettingStarted.html#for-developers-to-work-with-a-git-monorepo as well. On Wed, Oct 24, 2018 at 4:57 AM Jacob Carlborg via lldb-dev < lldb-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > On 2018-10-24 08:25, Whisperity via cfe-dev wrote: > > They are not shown in the project graph, but if you open the "branch" > > drop down it has a tab named 'Tags'. > > It shows some tags there, but n...

...r distro (except on Windows where these are the official > binaries). The problem is, depending on which operating system and version you use you might not get updates. For example, Travis CI is stuck at an ancient version of Ubuntu and only provides LLVM 5.0, as far as I can see. -- /Jacob Carlborg

I've noticed that there are no tags in any of the Git mirrors [1], [2] or [3]. Would it be possible to add the tags? [1] https://git.llvm.org/git/llvm.git [2] https://github.com/llvm-mirror/llvm [3] https://github.com/llvm-project/llvm-project-20170507 -- /Jacob Carlborg

...4. > > Uploaded clang+llvm-5.0.0-linux-x86_64-ubuntu16.04.tar.xz and > clang+llvm-5.0.0-linux-x86_64-ubuntu14.04.tar.xz This one has a different name than all the other releases :(. The other releases are named clang+llvm-<VERSION>-x86_64-linux-gnu-ubuntu-14.04.tar.xz. -- /Jacob Carlborg

...he following to files did work: http://releases.llvm.org/4.0.0/clang+llvm-4.0.0-x86_64-apple-darwin.tar.xz http://releases.llvm.org/3.9.0/clang+llvm-3.9.0-x86_64-apple-darwin.tar.xz Trying the same files now, I got a reply within 10-30 seconds. So it might just be that it's slow. -- /Jacob Carlborg

On 2018-01-15 22:45, Anton Korobeynikov via llvm-dev wrote: > This should be fixed as of now. I just tried again, it takes over 60 seconds to get a reply. -- /Jacob Carlborg

...cores. > Give the Ubuntu VM 2g and 1 (maybe 2) core/s and it should be fine. At work, it takes significantly longer to boot our Ruby on Rails application on a virtual machine than natively. I also noticed that disk access can be quite slow on a virtual machine compared to native. -- /Jacob Carlborg

...te timeout 2018-02-05 13:41:00 ERROR 503: first byte timeout. On Wed, Jan 17, 2018 at 6:17 PM, Anton Korobeynikov via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > This is strange and everything is fast for me. Let's continue off-list. > > On Wed, Jan 17, 2018 at 8:13 PM, Jacob Carlborg via llvm-dev > <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: >> On 2018-01-17 12:29, Anton Korobeynikov via llvm-dev wrote: >>> >>> Which URL ? >> >> >> They all seem to be slow. But here's one example: >> >> https://releases.llvm.org/4.0.0/c...

...Proposals/GitHubMove.html > updated with the current status of things? > > > > And once things are usable, probably update > https://llvm.org/docs/GettingStarted.html#for-developers-to-work-with-a-git-monorepo > as well. > > > > On Wed, Oct 24, 2018 at 4:57 AM Jacob Carlborg via lldb-dev < > lldb-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > >> > >> On 2018-10-24 08:25, Whisperity via cfe-dev wrote: > >> > They are not shown in the project graph, but if you open the "branch" > >> > drop down it has a tab named 'Tags...

On Jul 24, 2013 2:52 AM, "Jacob Carlborg" <doob at me.com> wrote: > > Do your LLVM development on Mac OS X :) Should work well. Apple is one of the bigger supporters of LLVM, so I'd hope OS X would be a suitable dev platform. > It depends on what your needs are. Using VirtualBox will probably be the easiest. It al...

...for testing! Please download them and compile and test things. See if it breaks your code! Please file bugs for any issues you encounter. At this point, we’re only accepting fixes for regressions from 3.3. Cool. For convenience, here are the links http://llvm.org/pre-releases/3.4/rc2 -- /Jacob Carlborg

...7-20 00:16, Mehdi Amini via llvm-dev wrote: > Sure, "running a decent and stable web service is not a simple task”, that’s what I’m saying. Perhaps Travis CI could be used. They support triggering builds using an API [1]. [1] https://docs.travis-ci.com/user/triggering-builds -- /Jacob Carlborg

...'m curious what are the reasons behind? I'm a bit curious as well. I would expect this to be an automated process but since every single release of LLVM has binaries for different platforms or versions available compared to the previous release I looks like a manual process. -- /Jacob Carlborg

Hi LLD developers, This patch has been authored, reviewed, and tested by (as far as I know) the only maintainers and users of the MACH-O LLD code: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62185 I don't have commit bit, can someone who does have commit bit merge it? Best regards, Andrew -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type:

Jacob, We believe the issue is fixed now. Could you please confirm? On Sat, Jan 13, 2018 at 11:41 AM, Jacob Carlborg via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > On 2018-01-10 17:26, Hans Wennborg via llvm-dev wrote: >> >> Strange. Some of the files work for me, and some get the error message >> you showed. > > > I had a problem with the following files seven hours ago wh...

On 2018-01-13 21:08, Anton Korobeynikov via llvm-dev wrote: > Jacob, > > We believe the issue is fixed now. Could you please confirm? It's still taking between 5 and 22 seconds to get a reply. -- /Jacob Carlborg

Which URL ? On Tue, Jan 16, 2018 at 10:43 AM, Jacob Carlborg via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > On 2018-01-15 22:45, Anton Korobeynikov via llvm-dev wrote: >> >> This should be fixed as of now. > > > I just tried again, it takes over 60 seconds to get a reply. > > -- > /Jacob Carlborg > > > ____...