search for: caricatural

Hi. I asked a question about lda() and got some answers. However, one question remains (which is not independent of the earlier ones): What output does lda() produce which I can use to compute the posteriors? I know predict(lda())$posterior will give me precisely the posteriors, but suppose I'd like to compute them myself, outside of R. So far, I have not been able to use

Hi All, I'm having trouble with the colors on my screen getting translated to the colors in the outputted .pdf document. Here is a caricature of my problem: par(mfrow=c(1,1)) x1 = rnorm(1000) x2 = rnorm(1000)+10 y1 = rnorm(1000)+10 y2 = rnorm(1000)+10 palette(rainbow(6)) plot(x=x1,y=y1,col=y1,xlim=c(-10,20)) palette(heat.colors(6)) points(x=x2,y=y2,col=y2) dev.copy2pdf(file =

Dear List, I'm using GAMs in a multiple imputation project, and I want to be able to combine the parameter estimates and covariance matrices from each completed dataset's fitted model in the end. In order to do this, I need the knots to be uniform for each model with partially-imputed data. I want to specify these knots based on the quantiles of the unique values of the non-missing

...*actually* layer linkers with fine-grained components. That’s not a bait I’m gonna bite. > You are just saying that the current LLD is worse than an imaginary super-beautiful linker. Using superlative and trying to qualify what I’m writing with "imaginary super-beautiful linker” is just caricatural and diverting the whole point. LLVM is quite far from an "imaginary super-beautiful compiler framework”, yet it is modular and usable as a library. — Mehdi -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachment...

...are proposing a different architecture, so you need to explain it. > You are just saying that the current LLD is worse than an imaginary > super-beautiful linker. > > > Using superlative and trying to qualify what I’m writing with "imaginary > super-beautiful linker” is just caricatural and diverting the whole point. > LLVM is quite far from an "imaginary super-beautiful compiler framework”, > yet it is modular and usable as a library. > > — > Mehdi > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.o...

Warren Young wrote: > On Dec 9, 2015, at 11:55 AM, m.roth at 5-cent.us wrote: >> Matthew Miller wrote: >>> On Wed, Dec 09, 2015 at 01:05:15PM -0500, m.roth at 5-cent.us wrote: >>>>>> >>>> So, you're saying that end users need to go poke their noses into the >>>> development process >>> >>> If you want to go out of

...oing this does not impact and is not relevant to the discussion at stance.. >> You are just saying that the current LLD is worse than an imaginary super-beautiful linker. > > Using superlative and trying to qualify what I’m writing with "imaginary super-beautiful linker” is just caricatural and diverting the whole point. LLVM is quite far from an "imaginary super-beautiful compiler framework”, yet it is modular and usable as a library. > > — > Mehdi -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm...

On Tue, Dec 13, 2016 at 11:02 AM, Mehdi Amini <mehdi.amini at apple.com> wrote: > > On Dec 13, 2016, at 10:06 AM, Rui Ueyama <ruiu at google.com> wrote: > > On Tue, Dec 13, 2016 at 9:28 AM, Mehdi Amini <mehdi.amini at apple.com> > wrote: > >> >> > On Dec 13, 2016, at 5:55 AM, Rafael Avila de Espindola via llvm-dev < >> llvm-dev at

I've sometimes thought it would be useful to have another mail list called "no I haven't read the documentation but someone can save me a lot of time," or perhaps just "newbie" for short. This can be very useful for people just getting started in R and with school starting soon I expect the help list may become overwhelmed. Of course, I think that people should read all

Matthew Miller wrote: > On Wed, Dec 09, 2015 at 01:05:15PM -0500, m.roth at 5-cent.us wrote: >> >> Why? Fedora is a development, rapid change distro. I just bugged one >> of >> > Because of the context of this conversation. We can't have user >> > feedback and involvement without user feedback and involvement. >> So, you're saying that end users

...there's a good way of make it work but failed. You are just saying that the current LLD is worse than an imaginary >> super-beautiful linker. >> >> >> Using superlative and trying to qualify what I’m writing with "imaginary >> super-beautiful linker” is just caricatural and diverting the whole point. >> LLVM is quite far from an "imaginary super-beautiful compiler framework”, >> yet it is modular and usable as a library. >> >> — >> Mehdi >> > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed......