search for: caricatur

...l give me precisely the posteriors, but suppose I'd like to compute them myself, outside of R. So far, I have not been able to use "coefficients of linear discrimiants" to do this, for they don't seem to be the alpha and beta in log(post) ~ alpha x + beta (this eqn being a caricature of LDA in Ripley). Caren -- http://www.nhn.ou.edu/~marzban

Hi All, I'm having trouble with the colors on my screen getting translated to the colors in the outputted .pdf document. Here is a caricature of my problem: par(mfrow=c(1,1)) x1 = rnorm(1000) x2 = rnorm(1000)+10 y1 = rnorm(1000)+10 y2 = rnorm(1000)+10 palette(rainbow(6)) plot(x=x1,y=y1,col=y1,xlim=c(-10,20)) palette(heat.colors(6)) points(x=x2,y=y2,col=y2) dev.copy2pdf(file = "broke.pdf", height = 8, width = 8) I plot...

...ues of the non-missing original data, ignoring the NA's. When I fit the GAM with the imputed data included, I don't want mgcv to use the data that it is supplied to figure out the knots, because this will lead to un-comparable results when the many fitted models are combined. Here is a caricatured example of what I want to do: #Random data x = runif(1000,0,1) y = (log(x^2)+x^3)/sin(x) example = gam(y~s(x)) plot(example) #But I want to define my own knots dumb.knots = c(.7,.8,.9) dumb.example = gam(y~s(x,k=3),knots=list(dumb.knots)) plot(dumb.example) dumb.example2 = gam(y~s(x,k=3)) plot(...

...*actually* layer linkers with fine-grained components. That’s not a bait I’m gonna bite. > You are just saying that the current LLD is worse than an imaginary super-beautiful linker. Using superlative and trying to qualify what I’m writing with "imaginary super-beautiful linker” is just caricatural and diverting the whole point. LLVM is quite far from an "imaginary super-beautiful compiler framework”, yet it is modular and usable as a library. — Mehdi -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachme...

...are proposing a different architecture, so you need to explain it. > You are just saying that the current LLD is worse than an imaginary > super-beautiful linker. > > > Using superlative and trying to qualify what I’m writing with "imaginary > super-beautiful linker” is just caricatural and diverting the whole point. > LLVM is quite far from an "imaginary super-beautiful compiler framework”, > yet it is modular and usable as a library. > > — > Mehdi > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm...

...: how >> many times have folks on the development side poked their nose in here >> - the general redhat list is pretty dead - and asked anything? > > So?you want veto power over Fedora? You want every proposed change to > cross your desk for a yea/nay? Beg pardon? Why are you caricaturing what I said? I don't believe any of us who are complaining are talking about every small change; rather, the major ones. As a lesser example, I just *adore* the new ethernet names - NOT. Breaks scripts, makes it all more difficult, not to mention *so* much easier to guess, when you've d...

...oing this does not impact and is not relevant to the discussion at stance.. >> You are just saying that the current LLD is worse than an imaginary super-beautiful linker. > > Using superlative and trying to qualify what I’m writing with "imaginary super-beautiful linker” is just caricatural and diverting the whole point. LLVM is quite far from an "imaginary super-beautiful compiler framework”, yet it is modular and usable as a library. > > — > Mehdi -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/ll...

On Tue, Dec 13, 2016 at 11:02 AM, Mehdi Amini <mehdi.amini at apple.com> wrote: > > On Dec 13, 2016, at 10:06 AM, Rui Ueyama <ruiu at google.com> wrote: > > On Tue, Dec 13, 2016 at 9:28 AM, Mehdi Amini <mehdi.amini at apple.com> > wrote: > >> >> > On Dec 13, 2016, at 5:55 AM, Rafael Avila de Espindola via llvm-dev < >> llvm-dev at

I've sometimes thought it would be useful to have another mail list called "no I haven't read the documentation but someone can save me a lot of time," or perhaps just "newbie" for short. This can be very useful for people just getting started in R and with school starting soon I expect the help list may become overwhelmed. Of course, I think that people should read all

Matthew Miller wrote: > On Wed, Dec 09, 2015 at 01:05:15PM -0500, m.roth at 5-cent.us wrote: >> >> Why? Fedora is a development, rapid change distro. I just bugged one >> of >> > Because of the context of this conversation. We can't have user >> > feedback and involvement without user feedback and involvement. >> So, you're saying that end users

...there's a good way of make it work but failed. You are just saying that the current LLD is worse than an imaginary >> super-beautiful linker. >> >> >> Using superlative and trying to qualify what I’m writing with "imaginary >> super-beautiful linker” is just caricatural and diverting the whole point. >> LLVM is quite far from an "imaginary super-beautiful compiler framework”, >> yet it is modular and usable as a library. >> >> — >> Mehdi >> > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed....