search for: capture2

...ust tested the binaries from > > sl604p0g18-x64.tgz and still have the same issue. Here is another > > capture using the new binaries, although to be honest the ldlinux.e64 > > behaviour looks much like the first: > > > > https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/102712992/capture2.pcap > > > > Did wget that PCAP-file, found this > > 13:36:47.954215 IP 192.168.205.50.1938 > 192.168.205.1.tftp: 40 RRQ > "efi64/syslinux.efi" octet blksize 1482 > 13:36:47.954774 IP 192.168.205.1.47973 > 192.168.205.50.1938: UDP, length 15 > 13:36:47.95...

...e issue. Here is another capture using the new binaries, although to be honest the ldlinux.e64 behaviour looks much like the first: https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/102712992/capture2.pcap Thanks,...

...rom > > > sl604p0g18-x64.tgz and still have the same issue. Here is another > > > capture using the new binaries, although to be honest the ldlinux.e64 > > > behaviour looks much like the first: > > > > > > https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/102712992/capture2.pcap > > > > > > > Did wget that PCAP-file > > > > $ /usr/sbin/tcpdump -r capture2.pcap ether host 00:15:5d:7c:99:03 | tail > > reading from file capture2.pcap, link-type EN10MB (Ethernet) > > 13:36:47.964568 IP 192.168.205.1.47973 > 192.168.205.50.19...

...the quick reply. I have just tested the binaries from > sl604p0g18-x64.tgz and still have the same issue. Here is another > capture using the new binaries, although to be honest the ldlinux.e64 > behaviour looks much like the first: > > https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/102712992/capture2.pcap > Did wget that PCAP-file, found this 13:36:47.954215 IP 192.168.205.50.1938 > 192.168.205.1.tftp: 40 RRQ "efi64/syslinux.efi" octet blksize 1482 13:36:47.954774 IP 192.168.205.1.47973 > 192.168.205.50.1938: UDP, length 15 13:36:47.955380 IP 192.168.205.50.1938 > 192....

...problems with read.table is that it produces row names that I don't want. Also I need commas in my output file. So far this is the best I could do: mydata = read.table("C:/ozone3.txt", sep = "") capture.output( print(mydata, sep = ",", print.gap=3), file="capture2.txt" ) and the output has all the unwanted row names and also there are no commas. Any suggestions? Thank you Nasrin [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

...fferent between input and output the > echo_canceller function for this recording. > Maybe there is some nonlinearity issue there? The link of this > file(Capture1.zip) is in > http://lists.xiph.org/pipermail/speex-dev/2007-March/005390.html > There is another record set in the file(Capture2.zip) which I got 141 > sample delay and drift of 14. > I did not record this file so I don't know if it is from the same > sound card. The PC simulation > only gets about 10 to 15db ERLE. It could be also a linearity issue. > > On 3/22/07, Jean-Marc Valin <jean-marc.valin...

...me between "beg" and "end" overlaps midnight. I want to compare the frequency of each activity for each day so a row for a phase that overlaps on two dates unbalances the graphs I create with this data. Ex: >From the original row: http://r.789695.n4.nabble.com/file/n4077622/Capture2.png Note: "phasetime" is only a difftime between "end" and "beg". "phaseno" and "activity" should stay the same for the two new lines. Here is a sample of my data that covers a few days: http://r.789695.n4.nabble.com/file/n4077622/examp...

> Thanks for the great work. It indeed helps to diagnose of echo > canceller and narrow down the > problem area. Good, so it worked for you? > I am not an expert in the signaling processing but I > wonder if it is possible > to add the linearity check in the echo_diagnostic function? Theoretically, yes. In practice, I'm not sure how accurate it would be. Do you have any

...don't see the any different between input and output the echo_canceller function for this recording. Maybe there is some nonlinearity issue there? The link of this file(Capture1.zip) is in http://lists.xiph.org/pipermail/speex-dev/2007-March/005390.html There is another record set in the file(Capture2.zip) which I got 141 sample delay and drift of 14. I did not record this file so I don't know if it is from the same sound card. The PC simulation only gets about 10 to 15db ERLE. It could be also a linearity issue. On 3/22/07, Jean-Marc Valin <jean-marc.valin@usherbrooke.ca> wrote: &gt...

...LE plus 15+ NLP/ES should make the residual echo inaudible. I am not sure about the nonlinearity of those recording files but I would appreciate it if you could take a look of those. I uploaded them to http://www.sharebigfile.com/file/101511/capture-zip.htmlCapture1.zip is first case, 20db ERL. Capture2.zip is second case, 0db ERL. Bunch of thanks! Regards,William> Date: Mon, 5 Mar 2007 20:27:39 +1100> From: jean-marc.valin@usherbrooke.ca> To: espzzh@hotmail.com> CC: speex-dev@xiph.org> Subject: Re: [Speex-dev] Performance of the acoustic echo canceller> > Best advice I can g...

...LE plus 15+ NLP/ES should make the residual echo inaudible. I am not sure about the nonlinearity of those recording files but I would appreciate it if you could take a look of those. I uploaded them to http://www.sharebigfile.com/file/101511/capture-zip.htmlCapture1.zip is first case, 20db ERL. Capture2.zip is second case, 0db ERL. Bunch of thanks! Regards,William > Date: Mon, 5 Mar 2007 20:27:39 +1100> From: jean-marc.valin@usherbrooke.ca> To: espzzh@hotmail.com> CC: speex-dev@xiph.org> Subject: Re: [Speex-dev] Performance of the acoustic echo canceller> > Best advice I can...

...plus 15+ NLP/ES should make the residual echo inaudible. I am not sure about the nonlinearity of those recording files but I would appreciate it if you could take a look of those. I uploaded them to http://www.sharebigfile.com/file/101511/capture-zip.html Capture1.zip is first case, 20db ERL. Capture2.zip is second case, 0db ERL. Bunch of thanks! Regards,William > Date: Mon, 5 Mar 2007 20:27:39 +1100> From: jean-marc.valin@usherbrooke.ca> To: espzzh@hotmail.com> CC: speex-dev@xiph.org> Subject: Re: [Speex-dev] Performance of the acoustic echo canceller> > Best advice I c...

Hi, I am using a Windows Server 2012 R2 Hyper-V Generation 2 VM as a PXE client (no physical machines available). This is a UEFI VM, and as per instructions I've read I have disabled secure boot on this VM for the installation of Linux. I am using the latest tftp-hpa package with the following config: # /etc/default/tftpd-hpa TFTP_USERNAME="tftp"

Xen 3.4 xen-unstable.hg from yesterday with debian etch on 64bit arch Intel/Lenovo Q35 Mainboard with VT-d enabled Bootoptions iommu=1 vtd=1 pci.backhide for a PCI-E nvidia graphiccard xm dmesg Error messages includes: [VT-D] iommu.c: 1694:d32767 iommu: mapping reserved region failed [VT-D] iommu.c: 1542:d0 intel_iommu_add_device: context mapping failed If i try to start my HVM by xm create

We're using Samba 3.0.21a-1 on a CentOS 4.2 server (kernel 2.6.9-22.0.2.ELsmp); everything works more or less fine, it's functioning as the PDC with an OpenLDAP back end (setup essentially straight from the Idealx.org playbook), etc. We're trying to mount Windows shares to back them up, and getting "permission denied" errors when trying to read certain files from those