search for: captivate

Test the just-fixed bug in --run failing to detect an nbdkit assertion failure. While at it, sleep less when we don't actually need to wait for the socket to be opened. Signed-off-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com> --- tests/test-captive.sh | 46 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---- 1 file changed, 42 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/tests/test-captive.sh

I'd like to propose we backport this to 1.18 and some earlier stable branches too. Rich.

Found while working on the retry filter. Swap the order of the two patches to see nbdkit ignore assertion failures with status 0. Eric Blake (2): server: Propagate unexpected nbdkit failure with --run tests: Enhance captive test server/captive.c | 43 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------- tests/test-captive.sh | 46 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---- 2 files changed, 75

On Mon, Sep 30, 2019 at 12:15:42PM -0500, Eric Blake wrote: > Test the just-fixed bug in --run failing to detect an nbdkit assertion > failure. > > While at it, sleep less when we don't actually need to wait for the > socket to be opened. > > Signed-off-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com> > --- > tests/test-captive.sh | 46

In tests/test-eval.sh we have a test which looks something like this: nbdkit eval close='echo closed > file' --run 'qemu-img info $nbd' if ! grep 'closed' file; then fail; fi However there was a race condition here. nbdkit exits when the --run command exits without waiting for the captive nbdkit subprocess. Thus we couldn't be sure that the final

The existing --run '$nbd' outputs an older form that differs between libguestfs and qemu, and which is not always a valid URI. For historical compatibility, we probably can't change that; but we can instead add a new '$uri' that outputs a valid URI. Note that the libguestfs '$nbd' TCP form is already a valid URI, but that libguestfs still needs to be taught about the

The existing --run '$nbd' outputs an older form that differs between libguestfs and qemu, and which is not always a valid URI. For historical compatibility, we probably can't change that; but we can instead add a new '$uri' that outputs a valid URI. Note that the libguestfs '$nbd' TCP form is already a valid URI (at least, as long as the user isn't exploiting

On Tue, Jun 25, 2019 at 09:35:11PM -0500, Eric Blake wrote: > The existing --run '$nbd' outputs an older form that differs between > libguestfs and qemu, and which is not always a valid URI. For > historical compatibility, we probably can't change that; but we can > instead add a new '$uri' that outputs a valid URI. Note that the > libguestfs '$nbd' TCP

In data martedì 23 giugno 2015 23:49:54, Richard W.M. Jones ha scritto: > This allows us to test the daemon running as a host process, allowing > us to meaningfully test it using valgrind. > > This commit only adds a single test that check that the daemon starts > up, can be pinged, and exits. > --- > [...] > .gitignore | 1 + > Makefile.am

Includes a rework of the previously posted patch for --run improvements (mostly with improved comments and commit message; I decided that waiting for the captive nbdkit to exit was overkill), and four new patches. The tests are intentionally separate, to allow rearranging the order of the series to see the failures being fixed. Eric Blake (6): server: Propagate unexpected nbdkit failure with

When running captive, we were blindly calling kill(pid) of the captive nbdkit child process and ignoring failures, even if that process has already exited unexpectedly (most likely, from an assertion failure). Thankfully, because we did not wait on the process, we are guaranteed that the nbdkit child process is either still running or in zombie state, so no other process can recycle the pid yet.

When running captive, we were blindly calling kill(pid) of the captive nbdkit child process, even if that process has already exited unexpectedly (most likely, from an assertion failure) and another opened in its place (pid recycling is rare, but not impossible). We need to check that the child process still exists, and if it unexpectedly died, ensure that our exit status reflects that fact. Note

This allows us to test the daemon running as a host process, allowing us to meaningfully test it using valgrind. This commit only adds a single test that check that the daemon starts up, can be pinged, and exits. --- .gitignore | 1 + Makefile.am | 1 + configure.ac | 2 + tests/daemon/Makefile.am | 36 +++++++++++

This allows us to test the daemon running as a host process, allowing us to meaningfully test it using valgrind. This commit only adds a single test that check that the daemon starts up, can be pinged, and exits. --- .gitignore | 1 + Makefile.am | 1 + configure.ac | 2 + tests/daemon/Makefile.am | 36 +++++++++++

Can anyone recommend a captive portal solution that is compatible Shorewall? I know they are not completely secure but I have use for it. Thanks! Matt Burleigh Senior Systems Engineer 703-236-0800 ext 790 ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff done quickly with

Upstream Perl is going to remove '.' from @INC (the include path for modules) by default for the next major release (= 5.26) [1], as measure to fix security issues. Debian already started backporting the fixes for this [2], thus behaving this way in current Sid installations. Since the affected Perl sources are only the local daemon testing scripts, a simple fix is to force the

Dear Helpers, I just started working with R and I'm a bit overloaded with information. My data is from marsupials reindroduced in a area. I have weight(wt), hind foot lenghts(pes) as continues variables and origin and gender as categorial. condition is just the residuals i took from the model. > names(dat1) [1] "wt" "pes" "origin" "gender"

While we are unlikely to change our decision that -e should not control our response to NBD_OPT_LIST (because we intend to add a new callback .extents_list for that), it turns out that it is a lot easier to write: nbdkit -U - -e foo info --run 'nbdsh -u "$uri" -c "print(h.pread(3, 0))"' than it is to write the equivalent: nbdkit -U - info --run 'nbdsh -u

Hello, Forgive the cross-posting, but googling showed results from these two lists. I'm looking to set up a WiFi gateway with two nics, and iptables. The catch is i have to use a captive portal as well to ensure all traffic goes to a single destination. I've read about several packages, but haven't seen any docs that say how to integrate everything. If anyone has this setup

Now that kernels support vsock loopback, we have no reason to forbid --vsock with --run. Signed-off-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com> --- I'm hoping to commit something like this, but right now, the testsuite is failing more times than it succeeds, with: + port=1082294412 + nbdkit --vsock --port 1082294412 memory 1M --run 'sleep 1; nbdsh -u "$uri" -c