search for: capatibility

...a cool 24 degress C. I did read that some laptops were socket 479 but i double checked my laptop and it is definitely socket 478. Both my desktop and laptop are socket 478. When I boot my system up, it does tell me that its a Mobile processor. What kinda issues would I need to look for as far as capatibility issues. I kinda took the situation as, it boots up and runs so it should be fine.

Chris Lattner <clattner at apple.com> writes: > It's seems like a quiet and peaceful day, lets stir things up a bit :) > > How crazy would it be for us to start using basic C++'11 language > features (but not C++'11 library features) in LLVM: things like auto, > rvalue-refs, lambdas, etc? I think that we can keep things well > defined with a few simple

Seeing as I'm using OS X and Debian Sid which is on GCC 4.7.2-5 which moved over to Wheezy for Debian 7 release it seems more reasonable to target that than using Ubuntu's 4.6.x which is never more conservative than Debian on releases. - Marc P.S. I'm more interested in actually seeing if this will improve an actual smooth installation of libc++ with llvm/clang/compiler-rt trunk

On Thu, Nov 08, 2001 at 01:59:25PM +0100, Arthur de Jong wrote: > root and warthur both have user id 0. Sorry, I should have made that > clearer. They both have different passwords and rsa keys and I would like > to be able to make the distinction in the logs. Currently ssh only logs > that a ROOT user has logged in, not which one. hm, i don't think uid sharing is a standard unix

Hi guys, I'm planning of creating a speech/video conference application. This application will provide a system to see/listen to each personn present in the conference. So each ppl will have a audio and video stream. I'm wondering if you know a way to do this with asterisk or if it's supported ? If it is, i'm asking you about some documentation or related article (if you know

It's seems like a quiet and peaceful day, lets stir things up a bit :) How crazy would it be for us to start using basic C++'11 language features (but not C++'11 library features) in LLVM: things like auto, rvalue-refs, lambdas, etc? I think that we can keep things well defined with a few simple requirements: language features must be supported by MSVC 2010 and later, some version of

On Jan 8, 2013, at 4:24 PM, dag at cray.com wrote: > I am personally very much in favor of this. C++11 really is a huge leap > from C++03 in terms of readability, maintainability and safety. I agree completely. > Why not C++11 libraries? Implementation/capatability reasons? I don't > know anything about how the various implementation compare in terms of > completeness. But

Hello there, I've got a question about SATA. I've got ASUS P5GC-MX/1333 with ICH7. (SATA2 support) A few HDD with SATA2. system: uname -a FreeBSD diablo.miekoff.local 9.1-STABLE FreeBSD 9.1-STABLE #1 r246666: Tue Feb 12 00:19:07 MSK 2013 root at diablo.miekoff.local:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/DIABLO64 amd64 camcontrol info camcontrol iden ada2 pass2: <ST3500320AS SD1A> ATA-8 SATA 2.x