search for: cap_unix

Displaying 4 results from an estimated 4 matches for "cap_unix".

Did you mean: af_unix
[4.8] unix extensions negotiation and os x
2018 Mar 29
2
[4.8] unix extensions negotiation and os x
Does os x (10.13) support negotiation of unix extensions/CIFS? When hard links didn’t work I dug in and while I found info on CAP_UNIX, and added ‘unix extensions = yes’ globally, the Negotiation makes no mentions: Negotiate Protocol Request (0x00) Capabilities: 0x00000077, DFS, LEASING, LARGE MTU, PERSISTENT HANDLES, DIRECTORY LEASING, ENCRYPTION Negotiate Protocol Response (0x00) Capabilities: 0x00000047, DFS, LEASING, LARGE M...
[4.8] unix extensions negotiation and os x
2018 Apr 03
3
[4.8] unix extensions negotiation and os x
...rélien Aptel via samba wrote: > Dan Janowski via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> writes: > > > [ Unknown signature status ] > > Does os x (10.13) support negotiation of unix extensions/CIFS? > > > > When hard links didn’t work I dug in and while I found info on CAP_UNIX, and added ‘unix extensions = yes’ globally, the Negotiation makes no mentions: > > > I’m far from sure I’m looking at this the right way. Any hints greatly appreciated. > > Unix extensions havent been designed for SMB2 yet. I'm not sure which > version of the protocol OSX t...
[4.8] unix extensions negotiation and os x
2018 Apr 03
0
[4.8] unix extensions negotiation and os x
Dan Janowski via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> writes: > [ Unknown signature status ] > Does os x (10.13) support negotiation of unix extensions/CIFS? > > When hard links didn’t work I dug in and while I found info on CAP_UNIX, and added ‘unix extensions = yes’ globally, the Negotiation makes no mentions: > I’m far from sure I’m looking at this the right way. Any hints greatly appreciated. Unix extensions havent been designed for SMB2 yet. I'm not sure which version of the protocol OSX tries to connect with (1 o...
[4.8] unix extensions negotiation and os x
2018 Apr 04
0
[4.8] unix extensions negotiation and os x
...a wrote: >> Dan Janowski via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> writes: >> >>> [ Unknown signature status ] >>> Does os x (10.13) support negotiation of unix extensions/CIFS? >>> >>> When hard links didn’t work I dug in and while I found info on CAP_UNIX, and added ‘unix extensions = yes’ globally, the Negotiation makes no mentions: >> >>> I’m far from sure I’m looking at this the right way. Any hints greatly appreciated. >> >> Unix extensions havent been designed for SMB2 yet. I'm not sure which >> version of...