Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "cannoteliminatefram".
Did you mean:
cannoteliminateframe
2011 Dec 05
2
[LLVMdev] bug in ARMFrameLowering.cpp:processFunctionBeforeCalleeSavedScan
...her down where setScavengingFrameIndex should have been set. As a result of it was not being set there, there was an assertion failure (ScavengingFrameIndex >= 0) and subsequent memory corruption in RegScavenger::scavengeRegister.
I fixed this by performing the CanEliminateFrame and RegInfo->cannotEliminateFrame checks before the call to estimateRSSStackSizeLimit, since these values are available before BigStack is initialized. Does that sound reasonable? I've attached a patch with my change.
Oh, I should mention that the previous version of LLVM we used, 2.6, didn't include the check to hasStack...
2011 Dec 05
0
[LLVMdev] bug in ARMFrameLowering.cpp:processFunctionBeforeCalleeSavedScan
Hello Alok,
> I fixed this by performing the CanEliminateFrame and
> RegInfo->cannotEliminateFrame checks before the call to
> estimateRSSStackSizeLimit, since these values are available before BigStack
> is initialized. Does that sound reasonable? I’ve attached a patch with my
> change.
Will you please provide a testcase which reproduces the problem?
Thanks!
--
With best regards, An...
2011 Dec 05
1
[LLVMdev] bug in ARMFrameLowering.cpp:processFunctionBeforeCalleeSavedScan
...at cs.uiuc.edu] On Behalf Of Anton Korobeynikov
Sent: 05 December 2011 11:11
To: Alok Manchanda
Cc: llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu
Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] bug in ARMFrameLowering.cpp:processFunctionBeforeCalleeSavedScan
Hello Alok,
> I fixed this by performing the CanEliminateFrame and
> RegInfo->cannotEliminateFrame checks before the call to
> estimateRSSStackSizeLimit, since these values are available before BigStack
> is initialized. Does that sound reasonable? I’ve attached a patch with my
> change.
Will you please provide a testcase which reproduces the problem?
Thanks!
--
With best regards, An...