search for: callsn

...to specify in OpenMP that you want to be able to select choices at runtime. A common construct is: SCHEDULE(runtime) This will stop dragonegg from inlining some OpenMP runtime calls, which could complicate the code unnecessarily. Cheers Tobi P.S.: In case of directly inserting OpenMP function callsn it would be nice to have support for a set of LLVM intrinsics that will automatically be lowered to the relevant OpenMP/mpc.sf.net function calls. Let me know when you think about working on such a thing.

On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 1:36 PM, Gokul Ramaswamy <gokulhcramaswamy at gmail.com > wrote: > Hi Duncan Sands, > > As I have understood, GOMP and OpenMP provides support for > parallelizing program at source program level. But I am at the IR level. > That is I am trying to parallelize the IR code. This is the case of > automatic parallelization. The programmer writing the

...e to select choices at runtime. A common construct is: > > SCHEDULE(runtime) > > This will stop dragonegg from inlining some OpenMP runtime calls, which > could complicate the code unnecessarily. > > Cheers > Tobi > > P.S.: In case of directly inserting OpenMP function callsn it would be > nice to have support for a set of LLVM intrinsics that will > automatically be lowered to the relevant OpenMP/mpc.sf.net function > calls. Let me know when you think about working on such a thing. > _______________________________________________ > LLVM Developers maili...

Hi Duncan Sands, As I have understood, GOMP and OpenMP provides support for parallelizing program at source program level. But I am at the IR level. That is I am trying to parallelize the IR code. This is the case of automatic parallelization. The programmer writing the code does not have any idea of parallelization going behind the hood. So my question is instead of support at the source