search for: caller_addr0

...ate) { #ifdef CONFIG_TRACE_IRQFLAGS - task->kcsan_save_irqtrace = task->irqtrace; + irq_state->irqtrace = task->irqtrace; + irq_state->hardirq = lockdep_hardirqs_enabled(); #endif + if (!kcsan_interrupt_watcher) { + raw_local_irq_save(irq_state->flags); + lockdep_hardirqs_off(CALLER_ADDR0); + } } -void kcsan_restore_irqtrace(struct task_struct *task) +void kcsan_restore_irqtrace(struct kcsan_irq_state *irq_state) { + if (!kcsan_interrupt_watcher) { +#ifdef CONFIG_TRACE_IRQFLAGS + if (irq_state->hardirqs) { + lockdep_hardirqs_on_prepare(CALLER_ADDR0); + lockdep_hardirqs_o...

On Tue, Aug 11, 2020 at 11:20:54AM +0200, peterz at infradead.org wrote: > On Tue, Aug 11, 2020 at 10:38:50AM +0200, J?rgen Gro? wrote: > > In case you don't want to do it I can send the patch for the Xen > > variants. > > I might've opened a whole new can of worms here. I'm not sure we > can/want to fix the entire fallout this release :/ > > Let me

On Tue, Aug 11, 2020 at 11:20:54AM +0200, peterz at infradead.org wrote: > On Tue, Aug 11, 2020 at 10:38:50AM +0200, J?rgen Gro? wrote: > > In case you don't want to do it I can send the patch for the Xen > > variants. > > I might've opened a whole new can of worms here. I'm not sure we > can/want to fix the entire fallout this release :/ > > Let me

On Wed, Aug 05, 2020 at 03:59:40PM +0200, Marco Elver wrote: > On Wed, Aug 05, 2020 at 03:42PM +0200, peterz at infradead.org wrote: > > Shouldn't we __always_inline those? They're going to be really small. > > I can send a v2, and you can choose. For reference, though: > > ffffffff86271ee0 <arch_local_save_flags>: > ffffffff86271ee0: 0f 1f 44 00 00

On Wed, Aug 05, 2020 at 03:59:40PM +0200, Marco Elver wrote: > On Wed, Aug 05, 2020 at 03:42PM +0200, peterz at infradead.org wrote: > > Shouldn't we __always_inline those? They're going to be really small. > > I can send a v2, and you can choose. For reference, though: > > ffffffff86271ee0 <arch_local_save_flags>: > ffffffff86271ee0: 0f 1f 44 00 00

Currently the blacklist is maintained by hand in kprobes.c which is separated from the function definition and is hard to catch up the kernel update. To solve this issue, I've tried to implement new NOKPROBE_SYMBOL() macro for making kprobe blacklist at build time. Since the NOKPROBE_SYMBOL() macros can be placed right after the function is defined, it is easy to maintain. This series

Currently the blacklist is maintained by hand in kprobes.c which is separated from the function definition and is hard to catch up the kernel update. To solve this issue, I've tried to implement new NOKPROBE_SYMBOL() macro for making kprobe blacklist at build time. Since the NOKPROBE_SYMBOL() macros can be placed right after the function is defined, it is easy to maintain. This series

Hi, Here is the version 3 of NOKPORBE_SYMBOL series. Currently the blacklist is maintained by hand in kprobes.c which is separated from the function definition and is hard to catch up the kernel update. To solve this issue, I've introduced NOKPROBE_SYMBOL() macro for making kprobe blacklist at build time. Since the NOKPROBE_SYMBOL() macros can be placed right after the function is defined

Hi, Here is the version 3 of NOKPORBE_SYMBOL series. Currently the blacklist is maintained by hand in kprobes.c which is separated from the function definition and is hard to catch up the kernel update. To solve this issue, I've introduced NOKPROBE_SYMBOL() macro for making kprobe blacklist at build time. Since the NOKPROBE_SYMBOL() macros can be placed right after the function is defined