search for: calleesavedinfo

Displaying 4 results from an estimated 4 matches for "calleesavedinfo".

2015 Jan 11
3
[LLVMdev] [RFC] [PATCH] add tail call optimization to thumb1-only targets
...int to first LDR / VLDRD. Not for tail call returns! + if ((MBBI != MBB.begin()) && (!IsTailCallReturn)) { do --MBBI; while (MBBI != MBB.begin() && isCSRestore(MBBI, CSRegs)); @@ -395,12 +402,119 @@ } } - bool IsV4PopReturn = false; - for (const CalleeSavedInfo &CSI : MFI->getCalleeSavedInfo()) + bool IsLRPartOfCalleeSavedInfo = false; + + for (const CalleeSavedInfo &CSI : MFI->getCalleeSavedInfo()) { if (CSI.getReg() == ARM::LR) - IsV4PopReturn = true; + IsLRPartOfCalleeSavedInfo = true; + } + + bool IsV4PopReturn = IsLR...
2013 Jan 27
1
[LLVMdev] Clarification about callee saved regs and MachineRegisterInfo::isPhyRegUsed
Hi, I am confused about the call to isPhyRegUsed in calculateCalleeSavedRegisters: if (Fn.getRegInfo().isPhysRegUsed(Reg)) { // If the reg is modified, save it! CSI.push_back(CalleeSavedInfo(Reg)); } It seems that isPhyRegUsed returns true if the register is read or written in the function. If this is right, why do we save a register if it is only read in the function ?? I would have expected that calculateCalleeSavedRegisters use another function which would return true only when...
2017 Aug 14
2
LLVM Weekly - #189, Aug 14th 2017
...upport for the ARMv8.2a dot product instructions. (Question to my readers: Given Arm's recent rebranding, should that be Armv8.2a or armv8.2a instead?). [r310480](http://reviews.llvm.org/rL310480), [r310701](http://reviews.llvm.org/rL310701). * A new "Restored" flag has been added to CalleeSavedInfo. [r310619](http://reviews.llvm.org/rL310619). * Most AVX512 broadcast intrinsics have been removed and will be auto-upgraded when loaded old IR. [r310725](http://reviews.llvm.org/rL310725). ## Clang commits * The clang-proto-fuzzer tool has been created. This models a subset of C++ as a protobu...
2016 Jun 24
2
Suggestion / Help regarding new calling convention
On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 12:31 AM, Matthias Braun <matze at braunis.de> wrote: > I just discussed this with vivek on IRC (and I think we agreed on this): > > Let me first state the motivation clearly to ease later discussions: > As far as the motivation for this change goes: Changing the calling > convention allows us to choose whether a register is saved by the callee or >