search for: callables

Rather than catching a Python error at runtime when trying to call an object that wasn't callable, just ignore that object up front when loading the plugin. Signed-off-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com> --- Various examples on calling Python functions from C recommend doing this filtering check. plugins/python/python.c | 5 +++++ 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+) diff --git

this is my model: class Person < ActiveRecord::Base has_many :phones, :as => :callable, :order => :position end class Phone < ActiveRecord::Base belongs_to :callable, :polymorphic => true acts_as_list :scope => :callable_id end how can i add the callable_type to the scope. how can i say the scope is the {:callable_id,:callable_type} couple? is it even possible? thanks

I'm not there yet, but at some point I'm going to need the notion of a global callable function like symbol that's resolved at runtime. I've not given it much thought but I may need a new callable entity here (this is for the gnu ifunc stuff). Don't even know if this fits into the discussion, but since we were talking about weird symbols... -eric On Fri, May 23, 2014 at 1:26

Using llvm 9, visual studio, HowToUseLLJIT.cpp It works fine in a release build. In a debug build It aborts due to an assert failure on Core.cpp (383) because the lhs flags are (Exported | Callable) and the rhs flags are (Callable). What mods should be made to fix this issue? Side note: The comments at the top reference HowToUseJIT.cpp rather than HotToUseLLJIT.cpp Thanks, Rob Conde

libswfdec/swfdec_as_frame.c | 3 - libswfdec/swfdec_as_function.c | 66 ++++++++++++++++-------- libswfdec/swfdec_as_internal.h | 16 ++++- libswfdec/swfdec_as_interpret.c | 60 +++++++++++----------- libswfdec/swfdec_as_object.c | 10 ++- libswfdec/swfdec_as_super.c | 109 +++++++++++++++++++++------------------- libswfdec/swfdec_as_super.h | 10 ++- 7 files

Hi all, >>> I would favor calling conventions over metadata for the simple >>> reason that this maps more cleanly to the device model. Device and >>> kernel functions are represented differently in PTX, including >>> (sometimes) the way parameters are passed. >> For the record, marking the kernels with "calling conventions" >> instead

One of the great things about R is how readable and re-usable much of its own implementation is. If an R function doesn't do quite what you want but is close, it is usually very easy to read its code and start adapting that as the base for a modified version. In the 2.x versions of R, that was the case with read.table(). It was easy to experiment with its source code, as it all worked just

I argue we should spell C++ lambdas (and other function-like variables) like functions, not like variables. - Use verbs, not nouns. - Use lowerCamelCase. Here's a patch that implements the change to the coding standards: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48991 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D48991> Thoughts? -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

On 12/14/2011 02:41 PM, Justin Holewinski wrote: > I would favor calling conventions over metadata for the simple reason > that this maps more cleanly to the device model. Device and kernel > functions are represented differently in PTX, including (sometimes) the > way parameters are passed. For the record, marking the kernels with "calling conventions" instead of metadata

Hi, I want to be able add a function to a module after it is (partly) compiled in JIT. Let's say we have these functions: Foo() { Stuff; } Bar() { Foo(); MoreStuff; } I want to have a module with Foo optimized and have a callable pointer to Foo. Later, I want to generate Bar, optimize it (so Foo is inlined) and than get a callable pointer to Bar. Is this possible? If so, is there a way to

On 8/13/19 5:06 AM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > An optional Closure parameter, but otherwise works the same way as > Closure. > @@ -3778,6 +3777,7 @@ let generate_lib_api_c () = > ) args; > List.iter ( > function > + | OClosure { cbname } -> pr ", %s_callback ? \"<fun>\" : \"NULL\"" cbname Well, it also permits a

On 7/16/19 6:04 AM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > A Closure is a list of (usually one, but can be more) closures. In C > there is also a singe ‘void *user_data’ parameter which is passed by > the caller into the function and through as the first parameter of > each callback invocation. > > By grouping the previously separate Opaque and Callback* parameters > together we can

2011/12/14 Pekka Jääskeläinen <pekka.jaaskelainen at tut.fi> > On 12/14/2011 02:41 PM, Justin Holewinski wrote: > >> I would favor calling conventions over metadata for the simple reason >> that this maps more cleanly to the device model. Device and kernel >> functions are represented differently in PTX, including (sometimes) the >> way parameters are passed.

On Fri, May 23, 2014 at 3:06 PM, Rafael Avila de Espindola <rafael.espindola at gmail.com> wrote: > > > Sent from my iPhone > >> On May 23, 2014, at 17:51, Eric Christopher <echristo at gmail.com> wrote: >> >> I'm not there yet, but at some point I'm going to need the notion of a >> global callable function like symbol that's resolved at

On 8/13/19 10:12 AM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > An optional Closure parameter, but otherwise works the same way as > Closure. > --- > generator/generator | 57 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------- > 1 file changed, 46 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-) > > @@ -4394,6 +4399,16 @@ let print_python_binding name { args; optargs; ret; may_set_error } = > ) args; >

Depends on whether its actually the calling convention, or just an annotation (I don't know MIPS that well). Could you ever have a case where you want to declare a function as both mips16 and fastcc, or some other explicit calling convention? For PTX, we added two calling conventions to mark kernel functions (callable by host) from device functions (not callable by host). But this

For target dependent function level attributes, do I need to actually add them to the enumeration in attributes.h? I have for example, mips16 and nomips16 as attributes. Or is this supposed to be done with cc <n>

Yes, you could have mips16 and fastcc. Mips16 just means that processor mode to execute that function is "mips16". So in a mips16 designated function, I will just emit mips16 instructions and in a "nomips16" function, just emit normal mips32 instructions. I tend to call this "mips32" normal mode, "standard encoding" because in reality the processor is

From: Justin Holewinski [mailto:justin.holewinski at gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, December 13, 2011 10:50 AM To: Villmow, Micah Cc: LLVM Developers Mailing List Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] Changes to the PTX calling conventions On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 12:54 PM, Villmow, Micah <Micah.Villmow at amd.com<mailto:Micah.Villmow at amd.com>> wrote: From: Justin Holewinski [mailto:justin.holewinski

On 30 June 2014 16:16, Shankar Easwaran <shankare at codeaurora.org> wrote: > I think you are hitting a bug, the Observer pattern was added a few weeks > back, and may be there is some sort of uninitialized variable ? This is my back-trace at "-O2 -g" (since -O1 pass): operator() (file=<optimized out>, __closure=0x7fffffffde40) at