search for: call_n

Displaying 2 results from an estimated 2 matches for "call_n".

Did you mean: call_r
2011 Aug 05
0
[LLVMdev] RFC: Exception Handling Rewrite
On Aug 5, 2011, at 10:57 AM, Peter Lawrence wrote: > However it seems that if a landingpad-block has multiple predecessors (often the case, > multiple InvokeInst in the main body of a try-statement all go to the same landingpad- > block), then you cannot move the LandingpadInst in order to break a critical edge unless > you do it for _all_ landingpad-block predecessor edges
2011 Aug 05
3
[LLVMdev] RFC: Exception Handling Rewrite
Guys, on second thought... doesn't making the exception registers live from the InvokeInst to the LandingpadInst create problems for critical-edge-splitting ? if a landingpad-edge is critical and needs to be split, won't we be creating and inserting a new BB between the "invoke-block" and the "landingpad-block", and if we do then isn't there the