Displaying 2 results from an estimated 2 matches for "call_n".
Did you mean:
call_r
2011 Aug 05
0
[LLVMdev] RFC: Exception Handling Rewrite
On Aug 5, 2011, at 10:57 AM, Peter Lawrence wrote:
> However it seems that if a landingpad-block has multiple predecessors (often the case,
> multiple InvokeInst in the main body of a try-statement all go to the same landingpad-
> block), then you cannot move the LandingpadInst in order to break a critical edge unless
> you do it for _all_ landingpad-block predecessor edges
2011 Aug 05
3
[LLVMdev] RFC: Exception Handling Rewrite
Guys,
on second thought...
doesn't making the exception registers live from the InvokeInst to
the LandingpadInst
create problems for critical-edge-splitting ?
if a landingpad-edge is critical and needs to be split, won't we be
creating and inserting
a new BB between the "invoke-block" and the "landingpad-block", and
if we do then
isn't there the