search for: call_bail

...16:38:46] N [afr.c:2190:notify] replicate: Subvolume 'xeon' came back up; going online. [2009-05-27 16:38:46] N [client-protocol.c:5557:client_setvolume_cbk] weeber: Connected to 192.168.1.252:6996, attached to remote volume 'brick'. [2009-05-27 18:46:02] E [client-protocol.c:292:call_bail] weeber: bailing out frame LOOKUP(32) frame sent = 2009-05-27 18:16:01. frame-timeout = 1800 [2009-05-27 19:16:09] E [client-protocol.c:292:call_bail] weeber: bailing out frame LOOKUP(32) frame sent = 2009-05-27 18:46:02. frame-timeout = 1800 [2009-05-27 19:46:18] E [client-protocol.c:292:call_...

...of rpc requests are getting bailed out resulting glusterd to end up into a stale lock and hence you see that some of the commands failed with "another transaction is in progress or locking failed." Some examples of the symptom highlighted: [2017-06-21 23:02:03.826858] E [rpc-clnt.c:200:call_bail] 0-management: bailing out frame type(Peer mgmt) op(--(2)) xid = 0x4 sent = 2017-06-21 22:52:02.719068. timeout = 600 for 192.168.150.53:24007 [2017-06-21 23:02:03.826888] E [rpc-clnt.c:200:call_bail] 0-management: bailing out frame type(Peer mgmt) op(--(2)) xid = 0x4 sent = 2017-06-21 22:52:02.716...

...of rpc requests are getting bailed out resulting glusterd to end up into a stale lock and hence you see that some of the commands failed with "another transaction is in progress or locking failed." Some examples of the symptom highlighted: [2017-06-21 23:02:03.826858] E [rpc-clnt.c:200:call_bail] 0-management: bailing out frame type(Peer mgmt) op(--(2)) xid = 0x4 sent = 2017-06-21 22:52:02.719068. timeout = 600 for 192.168.150.53:24007 [2017-06-21 23:02:03.826888] E [rpc-clnt.c:200:call_bail] 0-management: bailing out frame type(Peer mgmt) op(--(2)) xid = 0x4 sent = 2017-06-21 22:52:02.716...

...bailed out resulting glusterd to end up into a stale > lock and hence you see that some of the commands failed with "another > transaction is in progress or locking failed." > > Some examples of the symptom highlighted: > > [2017-06-21 23:02:03.826858] E [rpc-clnt.c:200:call_bail] 0-management: > bailing out frame type(Peer mgmt) op(--(2)) xid = 0x4 sent = 2017-06-21 > 22:52:02.719068. timeout = 600 for 192.168.150.53:24007 > [2017-06-21 23:02:03.826888] E [rpc-clnt.c:200:call_bail] 0-management: > bailing out frame type(Peer mgmt) op(--(2)) xid = 0x4 sent = 201...

...96, st_blksize=4096, st_blocks=8, st_atime=[Sep 15 20:17:29], st_mtime=[Sep 15 03:02:15], st_ctime=[Sep 15 18:38:41]}) 2008-09-15 20:17:37 T [trace.c:1117:trace_lookup] trace: callid: 42 (*this=0x50cd30, loc=0x526bc8 {path=/home/will, inode=0x52d7c0} ) 2008-09-15 20:18:24 W [client-protocol.c:205:call_bail] brick-ns: activating bail-out. pending frames = 9. last sent = 2008-09-15 20:17:37. last received = 2008-09-15 20:17:37 transport-timeout = 42 2008-09-15 20:18:24 C [client-protocol.c:212:call_bail] brick-ns: bailing transport 2008-09-15 20:18:24 W [client-protocol.c:4784:client_protocol_cleanup...

...of rpc requests are getting bailed out resulting glusterd to end up into a stale lock and hence you see that some of the commands failed with "another transaction is in progress or locking failed." Some examples of the symptom highlighted: [2017-06-21 23:02:03.826858] E [rpc-clnt.c:200:call_bail] 0-management: bailing out frame type(Peer mgmt) op(--(2)) xid = 0x4 sent = 2017-06-21 22:52:02.719068. timeout = 600 for 192.168.150.53:24007 [2017-06-21 23:02:03.826888] E [rpc-clnt.c:200:call_bail] 0-management: bailing out frame type(Peer mgmt) op(--(2)) xid = 0x4 sent = 2017-06-21 22:52:02.716...

...[glusterd-handler.c:5913:__glusterd_peer_rpc_notify] 0-management: Lock not released for teravolume [2017-06-21 16:03:03.429032] I [MSGID: 106163] [glusterd-handshake.c:1309:__glusterd_mgmt_hndsk_versions_ack] 0-management: using the op-version 31000 [2017-06-21 16:13:13.326478] E [rpc-clnt.c:200:call_bail] 0-management: bailing out frame type(Peer mgmt) op(--(2)) xid = 0x105 sent = 2017-06-21 16:03:03.202284. timeout = 600 for 192.168.150.52:$ [2017-06-21 16:13:13.326519] E [rpc-clnt.c:200:call_bail] 0-management: bailing out frame type(Peer mgmt) op(--(2)) xid = 0x105 sent = 2017-06-21 16:03:03.20...

...rd_peer_rpc_notify] > 0-management: Lock not released for teravolume > > [2017-06-21 16:03:03.429032] I [MSGID: 106163] > [glusterd-handshake.c:1309:__glusterd_mgmt_hndsk_versions_ack] > 0-management: using the op-version 31000 > > [2017-06-21 16:13:13.326478] E [rpc-clnt.c:200:call_bail] 0-management: > bailing out frame type(Peer mgmt) op(--(2)) xid = 0x105 sent = 2017-06-21 > 16:03:03.202284. timeout = 600 for 192.168.150.52:$ > > [2017-06-21 16:13:13.326519] E [rpc-clnt.c:200:call_bail] 0-management: > bailing out frame type(Peer mgmt) op(--(2)) xid = 0x105 sent...

...bailed out resulting glusterd to end up into a stale > lock and hence you see that some of the commands failed with "another > transaction is in progress or locking failed." > > Some examples of the symptom highlighted: > > [2017-06-21 23:02:03.826858] E [rpc-clnt.c:200:call_bail] 0-management: > bailing out frame type(Peer mgmt) op(--(2)) xid = 0x4 sent = 2017-06-21 > 22:52:02.719068. timeout = 600 for 192.168.150.53:24007 > [2017-06-21 23:02:03.826888] E [rpc-clnt.c:200:call_bail] 0-management: > bailing out frame type(Peer mgmt) op(--(2)) xid = 0x4 sent = 201...

...of rpc requests are getting bailed out resulting glusterd to end up into a stale lock and hence you see that some of the commands failed with "another transaction is in progress or locking failed." Some examples of the symptom highlighted: [2017-06-21 23:02:03.826858] E [rpc-clnt.c:200:call_bail] 0-management: bailing out frame type(Peer mgmt) op(--(2)) xid = 0x4 sent = 2017-06-21 22:52:02.719068. timeout = 600 for 192.168.150.53:24007 [2017-06-21 23:02:03.826888] E [rpc-clnt.c:200:call_bail] 0-management: bailing out frame type(Peer mgmt) op(--(2)) xid = 0x4 sent = 2017-06-21 22:52:02.716...

Hi,we have use glusterfs for two years. After upgraded to 3.2.5,we discover that when one of replicate node reboot and startup the glusterd daemon,the gluster will crash cause by the other replicate node cpu usage reach 100%. Our gluster info: Type: Distributed-Replicate Status: Started Number of Bricks: 5 x 2 = 10 Transport-type: tcp Options Reconfigured: performance.cache-size: 3GB

I've just setup a simple gluster storage system on Centos 5.2 x64 w/ gluster 1.3.10 I have three storage bricks and one client Everytime i run iozone across this setup, i seem to get a bad file descriptor around the 4k mark. Any thoughts why? I'm sure more info is wanted, i'm just not sure what else to include at this point. thanks [root at green gluster]# cat

Hi guys, we have a rebalance running on eight bricks since July and this is what the status looks like right now: ===Tue Oct 18 13:45:01 CST 2011 ==== rebalance step 1: layout fix in progress: fixed layout 223623 There are roughly 8T photos in the storage,so how long should this rebalance take? What does the number (in this case) 22362 represent? Our gluster infomation: Repository

...49182 has not responded in the last 42 seconds, disconnecting. [2017-09-06 08:35:05.481223] C [rpc-clnt-ping.c:160:rpc_clnt_ping_timer_expired] 0-glustervol-client-790: server 192.168.0.21:49159 has not responded in the last 42 seconds, disconnecting. [2017-09-06 09:03:43.637208] E [rpc-clnt.c:200:call_bail] 0-glusterfs: bailing out frame type(GlusterFS Handshake) op(GETSPEC(2)) xid = 0x8 sent = 2017-09-06 08:33:39.813002. timeout = 1800 for 127.0.0.1:24007 [2017-09-06 09:03:44.637338] E [rpc-clnt.c:200:call_bail] 0-glustervol-client-760: bailing out frame type(GlusterFS 3.3) op(READ(12)) xid = 0x160f...

Hi, When self-healing is triggered? As you can see below it has been triggered however I checked the logs and there was not any disconnection from the FTP servers.So, I can?t understand why it has been triggered. Client-7 comes online, so may the image differ due some file corrupted? Or for some reason the ftp server was not able to write in one of the replicated storages (client-6 and

...rocess-name brick --brick-port 49153 --xlator-option gvol0-server.listen-port=49153 root 48227 1 0 Feb17 ? 00:00:26 /usr/sbin/glusterd -p /var/run/glusterd.pid --log-level INFO On "sg" in glusterd.log we're seeing: [2023-02-23 20:26:57.619318 +0000] E [rpc-clnt.c:181:call_bail] 0-management: bailing out frame type(glusterd mgmt v3), op(--(6)), xid = 0x11, unique = 27, sent = 2023-02-23 20:16:50.596447 +0000, timeout = 600 for 10.20.20.11:24007 [2023-02-23 20:26:57.619425 +0000] E [MSGID: 106115] [glusterd-mgmt.c:122:gd_mgmt_v3_collate_errors] 0-management: Unlocking fail...

...: failed to submit message (XID: 0x2, Program: GlusterD svc cli, ProgVers: 2, Proc: 27) to rpc-transport (socket.management) [2017-12-15 18:46:09.026582] E [MSGID: 106430] [glusterd-utils.c:568:glusterd_submit_reply] 0-glusterd: Reply submission failed [2017-12-15 18:56:17.962251] E [rpc-clnt.c:185:call_bail] 0-management: bailing out frame type(glusterd mgmt v3) op(--(4)) xid = 0x14 sent = 2017-12-15 18:46:09.005976. timeout = 600 for 10.17.100.208:24007 [2017-12-15 18:56:17.962324] E [MSGID: 106116] [glusterd-mgmt.c:124:gd_mgmt_v3_collate_errors] 0-management: Commit failed on nsgtpcfs02.corp.nsgdv.c...

...D: 0x2, Program: GlusterD svc > cli, ProgVers: 2, Proc: 27) to rpc-transport (socket.management) > > [2017-12-15 18:46:09.026582] E [MSGID: 106430] [glusterd-utils.c:568:glusterd_submit_reply] > 0-glusterd: Reply submission failed > > [2017-12-15 18:56:17.962251] E [rpc-clnt.c:185:call_bail] 0-management: > bailing out frame type(glusterd mgmt v3) op(--(4)) xid = 0x14 sent = > 2017-12-15 18:46:09.005976. timeout = 600 for 10.17.100.208:24007 > There's a call bail here which means glusterd was never able to get a cbk response back from nsgtpcfs02.corp.nsgdv.com . I am gu...

...rocess-name brick --brick-port 49153 --xlator-option gvol0-server.listen-port=49153 root 48227 1 0 Feb17 ? 00:00:26 /usr/sbin/glusterd -p /var/run/glusterd.pid --log-level INFO On "sg" in glusterd.log we're seeing: [2023-02-23 20:26:57.619318 +0000] E [rpc-clnt.c:181:call_bail] 0-management: bailing out frame type(glusterd mgmt v3), op(--(6)), xid = 0x11, unique = 27, sent = 2023-02-23 20:16:50.596447 +0000, timeout = 600 for 10.20.20.11:24007<https://urldefense.com/v3/__http://10.20.20.11:24007__;!!I_DbfM1H!H-ob27qPp9fpvcacuvx-Rq_m9Rdc7w0qO3r5pewwZCO30JJzs4eTic2nPJo3...

"May you live in interesting times" Is this a curse or a blessing? :) I've just tested a 3.1.5 GlusterFS native client against a 3.1.3 storage pool using this volume: Volume Name: pfs-rw1 Type: Distributed-Replicate Status: Started Number of Bricks: 2 x 2 = 4 Transport-type: tcp Bricks: Brick1: jc1letgfs16-pfs1:/export/read-write/g01 Brick2: jc1letgfs13-pfs1:/export/read-write/g01