search for: call1s

I'm trying to create a language structure that is a call to a function with a number of arguments that is only known at run time. I do this by using repeated indices to expand out a call with a single argument. However, when I change one of the arguments, all are changed. I don't see the same behavior when I initially create a call with multiple arguments. Even more strangely,

I tried to compile this snippet of C++ code: void FuncTest() {     int* a = new int;     int* b = new int[2]; } using: clang test.cpp -S -emit-llvm -o - > test.llvm and obtained this: define void @_Z8FuncTestv() { entry:   %a = alloca i32*, align 4   %b = alloca i32*, align 4   %call = call noalias i8* @_Znwj(i32 4)   %0 = bitcast i8* %call to i32*   store i32* %0, i32** %a, align 4  

I am working with some survival data with missing values. I am using the mice package to do multiple imputation. I have found code in this thread which handles pooling of the MI results: https://stat.ethz.ch/pipermail/r-help/2007-May/132180.html Now I would like to plot a survival curve using the pooled results. Here is a reproducible example: require(survival) require(mice) set.seed(2) dt

Thanks. isFreeCall() works well but for %call2 = call i32 bitcast (i32 (...)* @free to i32 (i8*)*)(i8* %call1) nounwind, !dbg !16 So I tried to figure out when the above instruction occurred. When <stdlib.h> is included, free(buf2R1); turn into call void @free(i8* %call1) nounwind, !dbg !16 when I forget to include <stdlib.h>, free(buf2R1); turn into %call2 = call i32 bitcast (i32

Hi, I want to edit LLVM generated IR file, like as given below, Original LLVM IR file, @.str2 = private unnamed_addr constant [17 x i8] c"\0AI am in one_11\0A\00", align 1 ; Function Attrs: nounwind define i32 @one_1(i32 %ivar1, i32 %ivar2) #0 { entry: %ivar1.addr = alloca i32, align 4 %ivar2.addr = alloca i32, align 4 %isum = alloca i32, align 4 store i32 %ivar1, i32*

if you don't include stdlib.h, where free() is declared, you'll simply get a default C function signature: int free(...); On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 1:56 AM, Jane <270611649 at qq.com> wrote: > Thanks. isFreeCall() works well but for > %call2 = call i32 bitcast (i32 (...)* @free to i32 (i8*)*)(i8* %call1) > nounwind, !dbg !16 > So I tried to figure out when the above

Hi, I want to call/add some functions(that defined in another file) on top of some functions, and reflect the same changes in object file. No, I am not looking for contractor. Thanks, Deepika On Tue, Feb 9, 2016 at 7:04 PM, mats petersson <mats at planetcatfish.com> wrote: > What is the condition for adding this code? > > What have you tried so far? [Or are you looking for a

Hi! I want to know the way that calls are answer in this case... I have queue1 and queue2, one agent that receive call from both queues. queue1 <- call1 queue1 <- call2 queue2 <- call3 queue2 <- call4 In my test the agent answer calls in this order: call1,call3,call2 and call4. I think this must be in this order call1,call2, call3, call4 like a big FIFO. Its ok this behavior? Could

On Aug 5, 2011, at 10:57 AM, Peter Lawrence wrote: > However it seems that if a landingpad-block has multiple predecessors (often the case, > multiple InvokeInst in the main body of a try-statement all go to the same landingpad- > block), then you cannot move the LandingpadInst in order to break a critical edge unless > you do it for _all_ landingpad-block predecessor edges

Hi, Yes I am looking for IR pass that will do insert call of functions that defined in another file. Links/suggestions that guide me to start for adding IR pass will help me so much. Regards, Deepika On Wed, Feb 10, 2016 at 1:03 PM, mats petersson <mats at planetcatfish.com> wrote: > So how do you know what you want to modify (conceptually)? > > Have you got a IR pass that you

R-helpers: I have a dataset that has 168 subjects and 12 variables. Some of the variables have missing data and I want to use the multiple imputation capabilities of the "mice" package to address the missing data. Given that mice only supports linear models and generalized linear models (via the lm.mids and glm.mids functions) and that I need to fit Cox models, I followed the previous

As others have mentioned, C++ mangles names (i.e., it changes the name of a symbol into a string that contains both the name, scope, and type of the variable or function), so if you know what the mangled name is of your allocator, you can recognize it. Additionally, I believe that functions with return values marked with the noalias attribute are, essentially, memory allocators because the

Hi, My requirement is something like as given below, a.c => a.obj contains a1() and a2() function b.c => b.obj contains b1() and b2() function main.c => main.obj call to a1, a2, b1, b2 Now, I want to move a1(), a2() from a.obj to b2.obj and on top of function b1() When I call b1() from main, it should call first a1, a2 and then function definition of b1 Can you please give me some

I''m having a problem with multiple Ajax.Updater instances. I have five small chunks of data being loaded into my homepage, and they seem to be firing off one at a time. So the pieces load up in the order they were called. Maybe I''m being a noob, but shouldn''t all those requests just fire away and then place the content as it gets received? I was doing multiple versions,

Hi guys, I think I have run into another CachingMemorySSAWalker cache bug. It's a bit tricky to reproduce, so I'd like to start by trying to show you what is happening when running EarlyCSE with my local changes to use MemorySSA. I've attached a debug log that shows that the value returned by getClobberingMemoryAccess(Inst) after a call to removeMemoryAccess is wrong. The

Hi all, There is a problem about how AliasSetTracker merging AliasSet's when meet UnknownInst. When adding new pointer it looks for existing AliasSet's aliased with new pointer. And merging them together. It is ok for pointers: if %A mayalias %B and %B mayalias %C then %A mayalias %C. But the same logic when adding callsite is wrong ( findAliasSetForUnknownInst). Callsite may be known

> That makes sense, and I think for "direct" values in your definition it is true that all direct values are r-values. > Why do we need DW_OP_LLVM_direct when we already have DW_OP_LLVM_stack_value? Can you give an example of something that is definitely not a stack value, but direct? The difference in definition is the intention: DW_OP_LLVM_direct means "we'd like this

Philip Reames wrote: >> 1. Introduce aAny. > > Having a generic any type seems fine. I assume you'd create something like > an llvm_any_type in Intrinsics.td? That's precisely what ifavpAny is about: integer, float, array, vector, pointer Any. aAny is meant for array-Any, and I wonder why so few people care about arrays. I'll go ahead with Any and llvm_any_type.

Awesome, thanks! Now I have another question. I have a matrix multiplication code. This is my code: #include <stdio.h> #include <stdlib.h> #define n 4 int main(int argc, char *argv[]) { int i, j, k; int A[n][n], B[n][n], C[n][n]; for(i=0;i<n;i++){ for(j=0;j<n;j++){ A[i][j] = 1; B[i][j] = 2; C[i][j] = 0; } }

This is my example (for.c): #include <stdio.h> int add(int a, int b) { return a + b; } int main() { int a, b, c, d; a = 5; b = 15; c = add(a, b); d = 0; for(int i=0;i<16;i++) d = add(c, d); } I run: $ clang -O0 -Xclang -disable-O0-optnone -emit-llvm for.c -S -o forO0.ll $ opt -O0 -S --loop-unroll --unroll-count=4 -view-cfg forO0.ll -o for-opt00-unroll4.ll