search for: calaby

On Sun, Jan 10, 2016 at 02:52:16PM -0800, Joe Perches wrote: > On Mon, 2016-01-11 at 09:13 +1100, Julian Calaby wrote: > > On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 6:31 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin <mst at redhat.com> wrote: > > > Add virt_ barriers to list of barriers to check for > > > presence of a comment. > [] > > > diff --git a/scripts/checkpatch.pl b/scripts/checkpatch.pl > [] &g...

On Sun, Jan 10, 2016 at 02:52:16PM -0800, Joe Perches wrote: > On Mon, 2016-01-11 at 09:13 +1100, Julian Calaby wrote: > > On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 6:31 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin <mst at redhat.com> wrote: > > > Add virt_ barriers to list of barriers to check for > > > presence of a comment. > [] > > > diff --git a/scripts/checkpatch.pl b/scripts/checkpatch.pl > [] &g...

...to make it easier to stop incorrect memory barrier usage. This replaces the checkpatch patches in my series arch: barrier cleanup + barriers for virt and will be included in the pull request including the series. changes from v3: rename smp_barrier_stems to barrier_stems as suggested by Julian Calaby. add (?: ... ) around a variable in regexp, in case we change the value later so that it matters. changes from v2: address comments by Joe Perches: use (?: ... ) to avoid unnecessary capture groups rename smp_barriers to smp_barrier_stems for clarity add barriers before/after atomic Changes f...

...to make it easier to stop incorrect memory barrier usage. This replaces the checkpatch patches in my series arch: barrier cleanup + barriers for virt and will be included in the pull request including the series. changes from v3: rename smp_barrier_stems to barrier_stems as suggested by Julian Calaby. add (?: ... ) around a variable in regexp, in case we change the value later so that it matters. changes from v2: address comments by Joe Perches: use (?: ... ) to avoid unnecessary capture groups rename smp_barriers to smp_barrier_stems for clarity add barriers before/after atomic Changes f...

On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 09:40:18PM +1100, Julian Calaby wrote: > Hi Michael, > > On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 9:35 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin <mst at redhat.com> wrote: > > On Sun, Jan 10, 2016 at 02:52:16PM -0800, Joe Perches wrote: > >> On Mon, 2016-01-11 at 09:13 +1100, Julian Calaby wrote: > >> > On Mon, Jan 11, 201...

...smp_(?:$smp_barrier_stems) > + smp_(?:$smp_barrier_stems)| > + virt_(?:$smp_barrier_stems) Sorry I'm late to the party here, but would it make sense to write this as: (?:smp|virt)_(?:$smp_barrier_stems) Thanks, -- Julian Calaby Email: julian.calaby at gmail.com Profile: http://www.google.com/profiles/julian.calaby/

...smp_(?:$smp_barrier_stems) > + smp_(?:$smp_barrier_stems)| > + virt_(?:$smp_barrier_stems) Sorry I'm late to the party here, but would it make sense to write this as: (?:smp|virt)_(?:$smp_barrier_stems) Thanks, -- Julian Calaby Email: julian.calaby at gmail.com Profile: http://www.google.com/profiles/julian.calaby/

Hi Michael, On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 9:35 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin <mst at redhat.com> wrote: > On Sun, Jan 10, 2016 at 02:52:16PM -0800, Joe Perches wrote: >> On Mon, 2016-01-11 at 09:13 +1100, Julian Calaby wrote: >> > On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 6:31 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin <mst at redhat.com> wrote: >> > > Add virt_ barriers to list of barriers to check for >> > > presence of a comment. >> [] >> > > diff --git a/scripts/checkpatch.pl b/scripts/chec...

As part of memory barrier cleanup, this patchset extends checkpatch to make it easier to stop incorrect memory barrier usage. This replaces the checkpatch patches in my series arch: barrier cleanup + barriers for virt and will be included in the next version of the series. changes from v2: address comments by Joe Perches: use (?: ... ) to avoid unnecessary capture groups rename smp_barriers

As part of memory barrier cleanup, this patchset extends checkpatch to make it easier to stop incorrect memory barrier usage. This replaces the checkpatch patches in my series arch: barrier cleanup + barriers for virt and will be included in the next version of the series. changes from v2: address comments by Joe Perches: use (?: ... ) to avoid unnecessary capture groups rename smp_barriers

Hi all, Julian Calaby has weighed in and provided a bunch of fixes for the dreaded cpu.c file. I've pushed them to the wip/cpu branch and I'd appreciate it if people could test them. Assuming you already have a clone of the repo: git pull git checkout wip/cpu and then build as normal. Cheers, Erik -...

Dear Sirs, i'm trying to set up my samba server as WINS server My smb.conf (global section) is: [global] #Parametri di configurazione Server netbios name = LIGHTLORD server string = Samba %v on (%L) workgroup = T-PLAN security = user bind interfaces only = yes log level = 3 log file = /var/log/samba/samba.log.%L.%m max log size = 100 os level = 255 local master = yes preferred master = yes

On Mon, 2016-01-11 at 09:13 +1100, Julian Calaby wrote: > On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 6:31 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin <mst at redhat.com> wrote: > > Add virt_ barriers to list of barriers to check for > > presence of a comment. [] > > diff --git a/scripts/checkpatch.pl b/scripts/checkpatch.pl [] > > @@ -5133,7 +5133,8 @@...

...rrier usage. > > This replaces the checkpatch patches in my series > arch: barrier cleanup + barriers for virt > and will be included in the pull request including > the series. > > changes from v3: > rename smp_barrier_stems to barrier_stems > as suggested by Julian Calaby. In fact it was Joe Perches that suggested it. Sorry about the confusion. > add (?: ... ) around a variable in regexp, > in case we change the value later so that it matters. > changes from v2: > address comments by Joe Perches: > use (?: ... ) to avoid unnecessary capture grou...

Erik de Castro Lopo wrote: > Hi all, > > Julian Calaby has weighed in and provided a bunch of fixes for the dreaded > cpu.c file. I've pushed them to the wip/cpu branch and I'd appreciate it > if people could test them. > > Assuming you already have a clone of the repo: > git pull > git checkout wip/cpu > > and th...