Displaying 15 results from an estimated 15 matches for "calabi".
Did you mean:
chalabi
2016 Jan 11
2
[PATCH v3 3/3] checkpatch: add virt barriers
On Sun, Jan 10, 2016 at 02:52:16PM -0800, Joe Perches wrote:
> On Mon, 2016-01-11 at 09:13 +1100, Julian Calaby wrote:
> > On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 6:31 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin <mst at redhat.com> wrote:
> > > Add virt_ barriers to list of barriers to check for
> > > presence of a comment.
> []
> > > diff --git a/scripts/checkpatch.pl
2016 Jan 11
2
[PATCH v3 3/3] checkpatch: add virt barriers
On Sun, Jan 10, 2016 at 02:52:16PM -0800, Joe Perches wrote:
> On Mon, 2016-01-11 at 09:13 +1100, Julian Calaby wrote:
> > On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 6:31 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin <mst at redhat.com> wrote:
> > > Add virt_ barriers to list of barriers to check for
> > > presence of a comment.
> []
> > > diff --git a/scripts/checkpatch.pl
2016 Jan 11
6
[PATCH v4 0/3] checkpatch: handling of memory barriers
As part of memory barrier cleanup, this patchset
extends checkpatch to make it easier to stop
incorrect memory barrier usage.
This replaces the checkpatch patches in my series
arch: barrier cleanup + barriers for virt
and will be included in the pull request including
the series.
changes from v3:
rename smp_barrier_stems to barrier_stems
as suggested by Julian Calaby.
add (?: ... ) around a
2016 Jan 11
6
[PATCH v4 0/3] checkpatch: handling of memory barriers
As part of memory barrier cleanup, this patchset
extends checkpatch to make it easier to stop
incorrect memory barrier usage.
This replaces the checkpatch patches in my series
arch: barrier cleanup + barriers for virt
and will be included in the pull request including
the series.
changes from v3:
rename smp_barrier_stems to barrier_stems
as suggested by Julian Calaby.
add (?: ... ) around a
2016 Jan 11
0
[PATCH v3 3/3] checkpatch: add virt barriers
On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 09:40:18PM +1100, Julian Calaby wrote:
> Hi Michael,
>
> On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 9:35 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin <mst at redhat.com> wrote:
> > On Sun, Jan 10, 2016 at 02:52:16PM -0800, Joe Perches wrote:
> >> On Mon, 2016-01-11 at 09:13 +1100, Julian Calaby wrote:
> >> > On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 6:31 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin <mst at
2016 Jan 10
2
[PATCH v3 3/3] checkpatch: add virt barriers
Hi Michael,
On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 6:31 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin <mst at redhat.com> wrote:
> Add virt_ barriers to list of barriers to check for
> presence of a comment.
>
> Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst at redhat.com>
> ---
> scripts/checkpatch.pl | 3 ++-
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/scripts/checkpatch.pl
2016 Jan 10
2
[PATCH v3 3/3] checkpatch: add virt barriers
Hi Michael,
On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 6:31 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin <mst at redhat.com> wrote:
> Add virt_ barriers to list of barriers to check for
> presence of a comment.
>
> Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst at redhat.com>
> ---
> scripts/checkpatch.pl | 3 ++-
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/scripts/checkpatch.pl
2016 Jan 11
0
[PATCH v3 3/3] checkpatch: add virt barriers
Hi Michael,
On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 9:35 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin <mst at redhat.com> wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 10, 2016 at 02:52:16PM -0800, Joe Perches wrote:
>> On Mon, 2016-01-11 at 09:13 +1100, Julian Calaby wrote:
>> > On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 6:31 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin <mst at redhat.com> wrote:
>> > > Add virt_ barriers to list of barriers to check for
2016 Jan 10
4
[PATCH v3 0/3] checkpatch: handling of memory barriers
As part of memory barrier cleanup, this patchset
extends checkpatch to make it easier to stop
incorrect memory barrier usage.
This replaces the checkpatch patches in my series
arch: barrier cleanup + barriers for virt
and will be included in the next version of the series.
changes from v2:
address comments by Joe Perches:
use (?: ... ) to avoid unnecessary capture groups
rename smp_barriers
2016 Jan 10
4
[PATCH v3 0/3] checkpatch: handling of memory barriers
As part of memory barrier cleanup, this patchset
extends checkpatch to make it easier to stop
incorrect memory barrier usage.
This replaces the checkpatch patches in my series
arch: barrier cleanup + barriers for virt
and will be included in the next version of the series.
changes from v2:
address comments by Joe Perches:
use (?: ... ) to avoid unnecessary capture groups
rename smp_barriers
2016 Jun 28
2
Please test more libFLAC/cpu.c changes
Hi all,
Julian Calaby has weighed in and provided a bunch of fixes for the dreaded
cpu.c file. I've pushed them to the wip/cpu branch and I'd appreciate it
if people could test them.
Assuming you already have a clone of the repo:
git pull
git checkout wip/cpu
and then build as normal.
Cheers,
Erik
--
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Erik
2003 Apr 01
2
WINS on Samba
Dear Sirs,
i'm trying to set up my samba server as WINS server
My smb.conf (global section) is:
[global]
#Parametri di configurazione Server
netbios name = LIGHTLORD
server string = Samba %v on (%L)
workgroup = T-PLAN
security = user
bind interfaces only = yes
log level = 3
log file = /var/log/samba/samba.log.%L.%m
max log size = 100
os level = 255
local master = yes
preferred master = yes
2016 Jan 10
0
[PATCH v3 3/3] checkpatch: add virt barriers
On Mon, 2016-01-11 at 09:13 +1100, Julian Calaby wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 6:31 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin <mst at redhat.com> wrote:
> > Add virt_ barriers to list of barriers to check for
> > presence of a comment.
[]
> > diff --git a/scripts/checkpatch.pl b/scripts/checkpatch.pl
[]
> > @@ -5133,7 +5133,8 @@ sub process {
> > ????????????????}x;
>
2016 Jan 11
0
[PATCH v4 0/3] checkpatch: handling of memory barriers
On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 12:59:25PM +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> As part of memory barrier cleanup, this patchset
> extends checkpatch to make it easier to stop
> incorrect memory barrier usage.
>
> This replaces the checkpatch patches in my series
> arch: barrier cleanup + barriers for virt
> and will be included in the pull request including
> the series.
>
2016 Jun 28
0
Please test more libFLAC/cpu.c changes
Erik de Castro Lopo wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Julian Calaby has weighed in and provided a bunch of fixes for the dreaded
> cpu.c file. I've pushed them to the wip/cpu branch and I'd appreciate it
> if people could test them.
>
> Assuming you already have a clone of the repo:
> git pull
> git checkout wip/cpu
>
> and then build as normal.
>
>