search for: caithness

Hi all, I have problems transforming a matrix into a data.frame: If I do: > is.matrix(parcelas.cobtot.conti) [1] TRUE > dim(parcelas.cobtot.conti) [1] 25 64 > a <- data.frame(parcelas.cobtot.conti) > is.data.frame(a) [1] TRUE > > dim(a) [1] 1600 3 Why a does not have the same dimensions than parcelas.cobtot.conti? I've tested with caith and the behaviour there

Andy, Take a look at Greenacre, Theory and Applications of Correspondence Analysis. He has many example of dealing with all sorts of data. Basically, the technique is relevant for 2-way tables -- MCA is an extenstion. It is not clear in your example whether CA is really appropriate -- you want to make an observation (if at all possible) fall in one cell, treating the others layers as

Greetings, again. This is not strictly an R question, so please feel free to ignore it if you like. My question is about the substance of correspondence analysis. Specifically, is it appropriate to use ca on a matrix of values such that the columns and/or rows are not mutually exclusive? To be more detailed: - The standard use of ca is illustrated in the example of corresp() (from MASS):

Playing around with examples from MASS4, I found a font problem in the mosaicplot in R-2.3.0. It doesn't happen in other plots. Running this example from MASS4, page 326... library(MASS) caith1 <- as.matrix(caith) names(dimnames(caith1)) <- c("eyes", "hair") mosaicplot(caith1, color = TRUE) ...I get an image as attached. The column and row labels are unreadable. It

dear, I am trying to plot a standard plot, but I want the x axis to be 1,2,4,8,16 with equal intervals between them on plot. I will appreciate some help. Thank you, Irina Irina Foss Environmental Research Institute North Highland College UHI Millennium Institute Castle Street Thurso, Caithness Scotland KW14 7JD United Kingdom Tel: +44 (0) 1847 889 587 Fax: +44 (0) 1847 890 014 http://www.eri.ac.uk/sub/staff.php?id=11

...function "wavelet" from dplR package. library(dplR) D2<-wavelet(d1,Dt=1) But the wavelets from two tests are very different. What is the reason?? Thank you, Irina Irina Foss Environmental Research Institute North Highland College UHI Millennium Institute Castle Street Thurso, Caithness Scotland KW14 7JD United Kingdom Tel: +44 (0) 1847 889 587 Fax: +44 (0) 1847 890 014 http://www.eri.ac.uk/sub/staff.php?id=11

...inside UK area, so that no contours are plotted over the sea. I was wondering if anyone can help me with this task and if I can get any suggestions how to do that. Thank you, Irina Irina Foss Environmental Research Institute North Highland College UHI Millennium Institute Castle Street Thurso, Caithness Scotland KW14 7JD United Kingdom Tel: +44 (0) 1847 889 587 Fax: +44 (0) 1847 890 014 http://www.eri.ac.uk/sub/staff.php?id=11

Ben Bolstad experienced something odd while running R CMD check over a package of ours using r-devel (yesterday's fresh). He tracked down the problem to a vignette calling 'library(MASS)'. Please kindly ignore if this is a known (and temporary) issue. Laurent ----- Forwarded message from Ben Bolstad <bolstad@stat.berkeley.edu> ----- Return-Path: