search for: cains

On Thu, Jan 21, 2016 at 9:52 PM, Brian Cain <brian.cain at gmail.com> wrote: > On Thu, Jan 21, 2016 at 8:31 PM, Eric Fiselier <eric at efcs.ca> wrote: > >> >> On Thu, Jan 21, 2016 at 7:04 PM, Brian Cain via cfe-dev < >> cfe-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: >> >>> SuSE Linux Enterprise Server 11SP3 x86_64 >>> >>> Looks like I

Ubuntu 16: a2a2768b04e1d561e6f9a1a2d525eda7aae18624 clang+llvm-7.0.0-x86_64-linux-gnu-ubuntu-16.04.tar.xz On Thu, Sep 20, 2018 at 7:12 PM Brian Cain <brian.cain at gmail.com> wrote: > Uploaded ubuntu 14: > > dec5ca53043c80c1c6e90c0473df84f0182d80af > clang+llvm-7.0.0-x86_64-linux-gnu-ubuntu-14.04.tar.xz > > > On Wed, Sep 19, 2018 at 12:58 PM Brian Cain <brian.cain

Hi Hans, we have uploaded tarballs for ARM and AArch64 targets: a20ea3fe482e754a61ccb37c67456ad1 clang+llvm-6.0.1-aarch64-linux-gnu.tar.xz f37b132c3dfb3b776524980be5af3a76 clang+llvm-6.0.1-armv7a-linux-gnueabihf.tar.xz and 47a9a9bb02d41581e6804b98918188f6 clang+llvm-7.0.0-aarch64-linux-gnu.tar.xz e639d8f5dc58be5cf44d017fd5eefd6c clang+llvm-7.0.0-armv7a-linux-gnueabihf.tar.xz Yvan On Mon,

Dear all, Lets say I have the following: > x <- c("Eve: Going to try something new today...", "Adam: Hey @Eve, how are you finding R? #rstats", "Eve: @Adam, It's awesome, so much better at statistics that #Excel ever was! @Cain & @Able disagree though :(", "Adam: @Eve I'm sure they'll sort it out :)", "blahblah") > x [1]

Well, is that possible to include libstdc++4.7 into llvm? On Wed, Jun 29, 2016 at 2:26 AM, Brian Cain <brian.cain at gmail.com> wrote: > Sorry if I was unclear, I have no problems building clang against a newer > gcc for my own purpose. But it doesn't make sense to provide a release > binary for clang that's hosted on llvm.org that's ostensibly for >

rc1 did not exhibit this mismatch. A repeat of the rc2 build repeated the mismatch. I diff'd the disassembly between phase 2 and phase 3 and the difference is the same on both builds. The difference follows: # diff x86isel_p{2,3}.s 2c2 < Phase2/Release/llvmCore-8.0.0-rc2.obj/lib/Target/X86/CMakeFiles/LLVMX86CodeGen.dir/X86ISelLowering.cpp.o: file format elf64-x86-64 --- >

It is possible to statically link against libstdc++, yes. I don't quite know all the pieces to the recipe in order to get that to work. It would require changes to the release script in order to get those configuration changes all the way through the third phase build. I don't believe any other tarball release does this, so it would at least be an unconventional release. On Wed, Jun

Sent from my iPhone > On 6 Dec 2017, at 4:17 am, Brian Cain <brian.cain at gmail.com> wrote: > > > >> On Tue, Dec 5, 2017 at 9:49 AM, Dean Michael Berris via cfe-dev <cfe-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: >> Hi cfe-dev@ and llvm-dev@, >> >> I've attached a Chrome trace-viewer readable trace of a clang built with XRay instrumentation (additional

cmake ../llvm/ -G "Unix Makefiles" -DCMAKE_BUILD_TYPE="Debug" -DCMAKE_INSTALL_PREFIX=../install -DLLVM_TARGETS_TO_BUILD="XXX" -DLLVM_ENABLE_PROJECTS='lld;clang;' ________________________________ From: Hans Wennborg <hans at chromium.org> Sent: Thursday, March 21, 2019 2:21 AM To: Josh Sharp Cc: Brian Cain; via llvm-dev Subject: Re: [llvm-dev] LLVM 8.0.0

Ah, yes -- you need to clone with --recursive. I will try the workaround though. On Dec 3, 2015 1:12 PM, "Kostya Serebryany" <kcc at google.com> wrote: > > > On Wed, Dec 2, 2015 at 7:17 PM, Brian Cain <brian.cain at gmail.com> wrote: > >> Kostya, >> >> Here's the git repo: https://bitbucket.org/ebadf/fuzzpy >> >> I've only

On Thu, 4 Aug 2016 14:03:39 +0100 Nabeel <nabeelshikder at gmail.com> wrote: > I should add, a password is *always* asked if a password has been set. > There isn't a way to bypass that. Then something is wrong. http://darcy.vex.net/star98.mp3 -- D'Arcy J.M. Cain System Administrator, Vex.Net http://www.Vex.Net/ IM:darcy at Vex.Net VoIP: sip:darcy at Vex.Net

>>>>> D'Arcy Cain <darcy at VybeNetworks.com> writes: >> Ie after both sides select t38, until they agree on the t38 terms. > OK, so does that mean that setting it to 25000 should leave time for the > re-invite or does the timeout start after that. As I wrote above, after that. After the sip/sdp. -JimC -- James Cloos <cloos at jhcloos.com>

On Mon, May 7, 2018 at 5:19 PM, Brian Cain <brian.cain at gmail.com> wrote: > > > On Mon, May 7, 2018 at 10:13 AM, Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek at gmail.com> wrote: >> >> ... > > >> >> sdi at iniza:~/src/llvm-toolchain/build$ ./bin/llvm-lit -v >> ./tools/clang/test/Sema/asm.c >> llvm-lit: >>

I know that it runs on other systems but do other ports get the same attention? I have been running it on a NetBSD server for about a year now and while it mostly works it just crashes from time to time with no explanation or core dump. I have improved the situation by expanding my intrusion detection but it still stops every few days or so. I have a cron job that tests for it and restarts it

I have an extension that looks like this: exten => 5555551111,1,Verbose(Door buzzer calling) same => n,Dial(SIP/user1&SIP/user2&SIP/user3) The idea is that any of the three users can answer the phone to let someone in. The problem is that if, say, user2 unplugs his phone then the call immediately goes to his voice mail and the other two do not have the ability to open the door.

I have an error sending to a specific fax number. It may be more than one but this is the one I investigated. It seems the delay for the SIP negotiation in T.38 was initiated after 6 seconds, however, our system sent the BYE after only 4 seconds, possibly cutting the call before all the communication necessary for the negotiation was completed. Here is the trace from our provider showing their

On Mon, May 7, 2018 at 10:46 AM, Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek at gmail.com> wrote: > On Mon, May 7, 2018 at 5:19 PM, Brian Cain <brian.cain at gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > ... > > Can you give a little more context? What is your ultimate goal for this > > activity? Why would you want to run the test in this fashion and what > > meaning would you

On Sun, Nov 22, 2015 at 8:09 AM, Renato Golin <renato.golin at linaro.org> wrote: > On 22 November 2015 at 03:59, Brian Cain <brian.cain at gmail.com> wrote: > > Should I expect the "-openmp" to work for this RC? > > Only if it worked before on the target you're building to in 3.7.0. > Ok, I'll check if I can get it to work on 3.7.0. > >

Alex, I have built ubuntu binaries for the last couple of releases. I apologize -- I haven't built those new binaries yet, I only have uploaded the SLES ones. I have an ubuntu 14 tarball that I'll upload today. I will work on getting ubuntu 16 or 17 next. The dpkg/APT repos might be a good substitute, though. Hans, apologies -- I should've asked to hold the 7.0.0 release for

On Sun, Nov 22, 2015 at 8:40 AM, Renato Golin <renato.golin at linaro.org> wrote: > On 22 November 2015 at 14:32, Brian Cain <brian.cain at gmail.com> wrote: > > AFAICT it's an OpenMP link error (that I got when running > "test-release.sh" > > with -openmp). > > Right. In that case, don't worry too much. > > The default release