search for: cacrpkdyw3ynpsnmy3a44gqn8dqk

Displaying 2 results from an estimated 2 matches for "cacrpkdyw3ynpsnmy3a44gqn8dqk".

2020 Feb 26
2
(no subject)
On Wed, Feb 26, 2020 at 01:08:06PM +0100, Linus Walleij wrote: > On Wed, Feb 26, 2020 at 12:57 PM Ville Syrj?l? > <ville.syrjala at linux.intel.com> wrote: > > On Tue, Feb 25, 2020 at 10:52:25PM +0100, Linus Walleij wrote: > > > > I have long suspected that a whole bunch of the "simple" displays > > > are not simple but contains a display
2020 Feb 26
0
(no subject)
...fresh rate, experiments at the maximum "pixel" * clock speed (HS clock 420 MHz) yields around 117Hz. */ .vrefresh = 60, I got a review comment at the time saying 117 Hz was weird. We didn't reach a proper conclusion on this: https://lore.kernel.org/dri-devel/CACRpkdYW3YNPSNMY3A44GQn8DqK-n9TLvr7uipF7LM_DHZ5=Lg at mail.gmail.com/ Thierry wasn't sure if 60Hz was good or not, so I just had to go with something. We could calculate the resulting pixel clock for ~117 Hz with this resolution and put that in the clock field but ... don't know what is the best? Yours, Linus Walle...