search for: caclulated

Hi i have found a problem related with tbf and the latency that the tbf calculates.. I have used the following parameters for burst and limit burst 100Kbit limit 500Kbit lat81.8ms burst 6Kbit limit 6Kbit lat 0us burst 200Kbit limit 100Kbit lat 4294.9s As u can see in the 3rd column the latency for 100Kbit burst and 500Kbit limit is 81.8ms but for 200Kbit and limit 100Kbit is 4294.9s!!! How

Hello, I would like to do a large number of e.g. 1000 paired ttest using the by-function. But instead of using only the data within the 1000 groups, R caclulates 1000 times the ttest for the full data set(The same happens with Wilcoxon test). However, the by-function works fine with the lme function. Did I just miss something or is it really not working? If not, is there any other possibility to

Full_Name: Marek Ancukiewicz Version: 2.01 OS: Linux Submission from: (NULL) (132.183.12.87) It seems that the the standard error of prediction of the linear regression, caclulated with predict.lm is incorrect. Consider the following example where the standard error is first calculated with predict.lm, then using delta method. and finally, using the formula rms*sqrt(1+1/n+(xp-x0)^2/Sxx). Marek Ancukiewicz > n <- 10 > x <- 1:n > y <- x > y[c(2,4,6)] &lt...

This what I have - sadly, it does not work :( . posts = {params[:topic][:forum_id] => { "posts_count" => "posts_count + @topic.posts_count"}, @topic.forum_id => { "posts_count" => "posts_count - @topic.posts_count" } } Forum.update(posts.keys, posts.values) It''s suppose to subtract the posts_count from topic, and add it and subtract

...e cryptation algorithm is stated before the hash, like "{md5}blahblah32bit". In the docs, it states that sambaNTPassword is a md4 hash, wich should be calculatable (haven't done it yet though). And last for the sambaLMPassword: I can't find any documentation about how it's caclulated, In some testcases i found online, it just have the same value as sambaNTPassword, but for some reason they differ in my configuration... I'm wondering in general about the sambaLMPassword attribute, is it only for OS/2 issues? or does it have some usable features as well ? (this IS a linu...

Hi, I''m using the application_helper.rb file to create some useful functions for generating links by name. I understand that functions defined in this file are available to all views, but what about constants defined in that module? Is there a best practice approach for doing this other than accessing each constant via ApplicationHelper::FOO? Stu

After posting my previous mail, I realized that i should instead post a patch against HEAD. This is because v0.12 was released while I was also changing ffmpeg2theora.c from v0.11. So please use this patch instead and apply it to version at http://svn.xiph.org/trunk/ffmpeg2theora Nilesh Bansal http://www.cse.iitb.ac.in/nilesh/ -------------- next part -------------- Index: ffmpeg2theora.c

...OUNTER calculates these values (ie basically just adds one if a particular combination occurs) and it is attached as a list object in COUNTER. is there a way of declaring "PUBLIC VARIABLES" (as allowed by VBA) that allows one to know the value of different variables as caclulated in different functions without using the method that i used. ie. using the value countcombs<-a$countcombs after calling a<-COUNTER(reelpic,nreels,countcombs,payoffcombs,payoff,bet) * Another question: in the function RUNDIST i used the following 2 lines zrun...

...;'d like to understand it better. In the Rail data, the uncertainty sigma_beta is dominated by the between-group error sigma_b, so in the 95% confidence interval I might have thought one would use a t-statistic with ~N_groups degrees of freedom, but it appears that the 95% confidence interval caclulated by interval() is using DF~=N-2. Any comments? Below is a transcript of an R session documenting the various issues mentioned about. Perhaps I''m just ignorant of some standard corrections that experts assume every one knows, and I''d appreciate any feedback. Thanks, Greg Greg...

Joseph Little wrote: > I''d love to "vote" to have this addressed, but apparently votes for > bugs are no available to outsiders. > > What''s limiting Stanford EE''s move to using ZFS entirely for our > snapshoting filesystems and multi-tier storage is the inability to > access .zfs directories and snapshots in particular on NFSv3 clients.