Displaying 2 results from an estimated 2 matches for "ca556d5c".
2011 Oct 19
0
[LLVMdev] Question regarding basic-block placement optimization
....size test, .Ltmp11-test
.Ltmp12:
.cfi_endproc
.Leh_func_end0:
.section ".note.GNU-stack","", at progbits
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20111019/ca556d5c/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: block_placement_codegen.patch
Type: text/x-patch
Size: 25889 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20111019/ca556d5c/attachment.bin>
2011 Oct 19
3
[LLVMdev] Question regarding basic-block placement optimization
On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 6:58 PM, Jakob Stoklund Olesen <stoklund at 2pi.dk>wrote:
>
> On Oct 18, 2011, at 5:22 PM, Chandler Carruth wrote:
>
> As for why it should be an IR pass, mostly because once the selection dag
>> runs through the code, we can never recover all of the freedom we have at
>> the IR level. To start with, splicing MBBs around requires known about