search for: c_sum

...ts relative value in B-file and save it as a new data frame named as C (e.g. C1 with V1 (row number) and V2 (A1$V2+B1$V2) ). Therefore, at the end I will have 253 C files (C1 to C253). I also would like to sum a number of the C files with each other (e.g. C1+ C2+ +C50) and save as a new file like C_sum. I already tried to write a short script to do all together but it did not work. I only was able to do for each C file separately. The main problem is that I do not know how to read several text files and how to use those files to make C files and afterwards C-sum files. I would be gratful if some...

...gt; > >> From a functionality point of view, I don’t care whether we use metadata or attributes. The VecClone pass mentioned in TOPIC 1 uses the following: > > >> > > >> attributes #0 = { nounwind uwtable > > >> “vector-variants"="_ZGVbM4vv_vec_sum,_ZGVbN4vv_vec_sum,_ZGVcM8vv_ve > > >> c_sum,_ZGVcN8vv_vec_sum,_ZGVdM8vv_vec_sum,_ZGVdN8vv_vec_sum,_ZGVeM1 > > >> 6vv_vec_sum,_ZGVeN16”} > > >> > > >> This is an attribute (I though it was metadata?), I am happy to reword the RFC using the right termi...

...;> >>>> From a functionality point of view, I don’t care whether we use metadata or attributes. The VecClone pass mentioned in TOPIC 1 uses the following: >>>> >>>> attributes #0 = { nounwind uwtable >>>> “vector-variants"="_ZGVbM4vv_vec_sum,_ZGVbN4vv_vec_sum,_ZGVcM8vv_ve >>>> c_sum,_ZGVcN8vv_vec_sum,_ZGVdM8vv_vec_sum,_ZGVdN8vv_vec_sum,_ZGVeM1 >>>> 6vv_vec_sum,_ZGVeN16”} >>>> >>>> This is an attribute (I though it was metadata?), I am happy to reword the RFC using the right terminology (...

...>> From a functionality point of view, I don’t care whether we use metadata or attributes. The VecClone pass mentioned in TOPIC 1 uses the following: > >>>> > >>>> attributes #0 = { nounwind uwtable > >>>> “vector-variants"="_ZGVbM4vv_vec_sum,_ZGVbN4vv_vec_sum,_ZGVcM8vv_ > >>>> ve > >>>> c_sum,_ZGVcN8vv_vec_sum,_ZGVdM8vv_vec_sum,_ZGVdN8vv_vec_sum,_ZGVe > >>>> M1 > >>>> 6vv_vec_sum,_ZGVeN16”} > >>>> > >>>> This is an attribute (I though it was meta...

...functionality point of view, I don’t care whether we use metadata or attributes. The VecClone pass mentioned in TOPIC 1 uses the following: > > >>>> > > >>>> attributes #0 = { nounwind uwtable > > >>>> “vector-variants"="_ZGVbM4vv_vec_sum,_ZGVbN4vv_vec_sum,_ZGVcM8v > > >>>> v_ > > >>>> ve > > >>>> c_sum,_ZGVcN8vv_vec_sum,_ZGVdM8vv_vec_sum,_ZGVdN8vv_vec_sum,_ZG > > >>>> Ve > > >>>> M1 > > >>>> 6vv_vec_sum,_ZGVeN16”} > > &...

...adata vs attribute > >> > >> From a functionality point of view, I don’t care whether we use metadata or attributes. The VecClone pass mentioned in TOPIC 1 uses the following: > >> > >> attributes #0 = { nounwind uwtable “vector-variants"="_ZGVbM4vv_vec_sum,_ZGVbN4vv_vec_sum,_ZGVcM8vv_vec_sum,_ZGVcN8vv_vec_sum,_ZGVdM8vv_vec_sum,_ZGVdN8vv_vec_sum,_ZGVeM16vv_vec_sum,_ZGVeN16”} > >> > >> This is an attribute (I though it was metadata?), I am happy to reword the RFC using the right terminology (sorry for messing this up). > >>...

...nt of view, I don’t care whether we use metadata or attributes. The VecClone pass mentioned in TOPIC 1 uses the following: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> attributes #0 = { nounwind uwtable >>>>>>>> “vector-variants"="_ZGVbM4vv_vec_sum,_ZGVbN4vv_vec_sum,_ZGVcM8v >>>>>>>> v_ >>>>>>>> ve >>>>>>>> c_sum,_ZGVcN8vv_vec_sum,_ZGVdM8vv_vec_sum,_ZGVdN8vv_vec_sum,_ZG >>>>>>>> Ve >>>>>>>> M1 >>>>>>>&gt...