search for: c_compiler

George Karpenkov <ekarpenkov at apple.com> writes: > Should -DCMAKE_CXX_COMPILER be also specified? CMake is smart enough to infer that from C_COMPILER: % grep CMAKE_CXX_COMPILER CMakeCache.txt CMAKE_CXX_COMPILER:FILEPATH=/Users/bogner/llvm-lkgc/bin/clang++ >> On Aug 24, 2017, at 11:29 AM, Justin Bogner <mail at justinbogner.com> wrote: >> >> (kcc, george: sorry for the re-send, the first was from a non-list email &g...

> The script used for building the binaries can be found under llvm : > utils/release/test-release.sh Thanks! A few follow-up questions: > # Phase 3: Build llvmCore with newly built clang from phase 2. > c_compiler="$gcc_compiler -fplugin=$dragonegg_phase2_objdir/dragonegg.so" > cxx_compiler="$gxx_compiler -fplugin=$dragonegg_phase2_objdir/dragonegg.so" Should that say "newly built dragonegg", not "newly built clang"? > echo "# Creating symlinks...

...lems with LLVM: problem I: ------------ on my linux machine (RHEL 4.8 ) the compilation of the LLVM compiler suit works, but if i start to compile my C source code with clang and llc, the compiler (llc) abort with: Segmentation fault 0 llc 0x0883b510 Stack dump: 0. Program arguments: /appl/c_compiler/xpic/llvm-2.7/bin/llc -O2 -f -march=xpic new_main.bc -o new_main.s 1. Running pass 'xpic DAG->DAG Pattern Instruction Selection' on function '@fib_recursive' make[1]: *** [new_main.s] Segmentation fault question: what does that mean? and how i can get more error informatio...

Are the packaging scripts used to produce the clang+llvm binaries on llvm.org under version control? If so, can you please point me to them? Thanks, Greg

On Tuesday 09 July 2013 15:11:03 Greg Fitzgerald wrote: > Are the packaging scripts used to produce the clang+llvm binaries on > llvm.org under version control? If so, can you please point me to > them? The script used for building the binaries can be found under llvm : utils/release/test-release.sh The packages are mere tarballs of the installation dir. Cheers, > > Thanks,

...-triple what to generate). > is that corret? > or > must clang also be adjusted to the target? > > the backend for a new targed XPIC works on windows XP very well, but > with my linux i have an abort: > 0 llc 0x0883b520 > Stack dump: > 0. Program arguments: /appl/c_compiler/xpic/llvm-2.7/bin/llc -O2 > -f -march=xpic new_main.bc -o new_main.s 1. Running pass 'xpic > DAG->DAG Pattern Instruction Selection' on function '@fib_recursive' As someone else said on the list, what is this XPIC target, because it is not part of LLVM. You should con...

Hello. I seem to be having the same problem that Paul had in the thread titled "[Rd] R 2.15.2 make check failure on 32-bit --with-blas="-lgoto2"" from October of last year <https://stat.ethz.ch/pipermail/r-devel/2012-October/065103.html> Unfortunately, that thread ended without an answer to his last question. Briefly, I am trying to compile an Rblas for Windows NT 32bit

...USE_SANITIZER=Address and -DLLVM_USE_SANITIZE_COVERAGE=On, which was working before: % cmake -GNinja \ -DCMAKE_BUILD_TYPE=Release -DLLVM_ENABLE_ASSERTIONS=On \ -DLLVM_ENABLE_WERROR=On \ -DLLVM_USE_SANITIZER=Address -DLLVM_USE_SANITIZE_COVERAGE=On \ -DCMAKE_C_COMPILER=$HOME/llvm-lkgc/bin/clang \ $HOME/code/llvm-src But when I run any of the fuzzers, it looks like the sanitizer coverage hasn't been set up correctly: % ./bin/llvm-as-fuzzer 2017-08-24 11:14:33 INFO...