search for: c_2

...e relation.... Hmm... Somewhat related, I would also like to plot a line in 3 d space... Finally, if you are feeling really brave, I am interested in doing all of this based on sums generating vectors (I know there is a linear algebra term for this) -- ie generate the plane based on c_1*v_1 + c_2*v_2 for c_1 and c_2 in reals. Thanks again to all you helpful folks! W

Dear All, I would like to generate m positive real numbers c_i, I=1,...,m, such that (1) c_1 + c_2 + ... + c_m=m, (1) after being ordered into c_1 >= c_2 >= .... >=c_m>0, we have that c_m is of the same order of m^(-1/8), when m is sufficiently large. Thanks, -Chee [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

...that all bits of the ‘|undef|‘ could be 0, and optimize the ‘|and|‘ to 0. Likewise, it is safe to assume that all the bits of the ‘|undef|‘ operand to the ‘|or|‘ could be set, allowing the ‘|or|‘ to be folded to -1." As a result, LHS = (undef & undef) | (undef & undef) = c_1 | c_2 where c_1 and c_2 are constants and as a result, And finally, LHS = c where c is a constant; not undef. Please correct me if I am missing something. Best Regards, soham On 9/13/2016 7:27 PM, Sanjoy Das wrote: > Hi Soham, > > Soham Chakraborty wrote: > > As a result, the t...

Dear all, It seems to be a recurrent problem to me and I am asking your help to get over it once for all ... My idea is : I have variables C_1, C_2, C_3 ... that corresponds to vectors of size n, and I would like to cbind them. I get a vector of their names using : temp<- ls(pat="C") And I like to find a way to use this vector temp as an argument to cbind. Unfortunately, my various trials failed, here are some samples of...

...* Suppose that:* *j in {1, ..., J}* *(level 1)* *i in {1, ..., n_j}* *(level 2)* *y_{ij} ~ Beta(mu_{ij} * phi_{ij}; (1 - mu_{ij}) * phi_{ij}) y_{ij} = mu_{ij} + w_{ij} * *with* *logit(mu_{ij}) = Beta_{0i} + Beta_{1i} * x1_{ij} + b_2 * x2_{ij} log(phi_{ij}) = Gamma_{0i} + Gamma_{1i} * z1_{ij} + c_2 * z2_{ij} * *Beta_{0i} = b_0 + u_{0i} Beta_{1i} = b_1 + u_{1i} Gamma_{0i} = c_0 + v_{0i} Gamma_{1i} = c_1 + v_{1i} * *The vector* *(u_{0i}, u_{1i})'* *has normal distribution with mean* *(0, 0)'* *and covariance matrix* *sigma_{00} sigma_{01} sigma_{10} sigma_{11} * *The vector* *(v_{0i},...

...hope to divide the original dataset into several subsets and output these multilple datasets. But errors appeared in my loops. See example. ###### a<-c(1:10) b<-c(rep(1,3),rep(2,3),rep(3,4)) c<-data.frame(a,b) #c is the example data num<-c(unique(b)) # I hope to get the subsets c_1.csv,c_2.csv and c_3.csv #Errors for (i in num) { c_num<-c[c$b==num,] write.csv(c_num,file="c:/c_num.csv") } Warning messages: 1: In c$b == num : longer object length is not a multiple of shorter object length 2: In c$b == num : longer object length is not a multiple of shorter obje...

Thanks for your answers. Another example of unsound transformation on Boolean algebra. According to the LLVM documentation (http://llvm.org/docs/LangRef.html#undefined-values) it is unsafe to consider ' a & undef = undef ' and ' a | undef = undef ' but 'undef xor undef = undef' is safe. Now, given an expression ((a & (~b)) | ((~a) & b)) where a and b are

...The vector* *(v_{0i}, v_{1i})'* *has normal distribution with mean* *(0, 0)'* *and covariance matrix* *delta_{00} delta_{01} delta_{10} delta_{11} * *The* *w_{ij}s are independents. Each* *w_{ij}* *has mean* *0* *and variance * *W*. *The unknown parameters are:* * b_0, b_1, b_2, c_0, c_1, c_2, sigma_{00}, sigma_{10}, sigma_{11}, delta_{00}, delta_{10}, **and* *delta_{11}*. *The question is: How can I use nlme package in R to fit this model? If you want to know additional information, send me a mail, please. In advance, thanks a lot for your help. Kind regards, Rodrigo.* [[alternati...

...?????U?????d???O??'???5??6 ?n4?%8???q???a??-"^ x?'?H?%?6?=?:%by??s;??A7?.???????)7?vx02?8??k?Q ????!?????v??y?c?v??x???/????2??m/Vv?o?????1???`DBI)S&???W?S{?1?)!c|??FE?Rrcb??K,??A?? ??`$?/g??????`??E/<?zn??}?5hw;y qJ?????=>?0?z???[U?|Ik???)?#? F?M<???>?d??w??? Z3?"?c_2?q}X????Q??5???W?!????? ?|??k?szy|?????{xL??sWd"??g??# ?? ??|8;??-Lx?!$??W???hv?O?**?xx-$??????>?&??&??e__????l' ??? ???????~???O?M?hT ?'?&??0wQ'??f?? _[????M??m??h?c:?}?G???- <? ??d?]:?.k,mTI??????eR????,?kJl??gqT????i??h?Y??Ndp(a?%?G??$???????1-e?G???v? V ???&amp...

> You found it. The SHL32 (not SHR32) line fixes the problem. It must be > doing a 16-bit shift, then extending the result (which is reasonable). As > it happens, that it the same macro which gave us trouble last May > (25th/26th), when the C55 build was more subtlely broken. Yes, that's what I finally remembered. I think I've fixed all occurrences (by adding EXTEND32)

Hola, I've done everything as correct as I can see in smb.conf under fresh ubuntu 6.06 fully updated install to have it run as a PDC on hostname florentine, domain DAVEYST. There are no testparm errors. I've added users with useradd and smbpasswd -a I've added machines with useradd and smbpasswd -a -m I can see the server in my network neighbourhood and access/browse folders on

Hello list. I'm trying to rebuild the 2.6.9.67.0.20.EL kernel, but it fails even without modifications. How did I try it? Created a (non-root) build environment (not a mock ) Installed the kernel.scr.rpm and did a rpmbuild -ba --target=`uname -m` kernel-2.6.spec 2> prep-err.log | tee prep-out.log The build failed at the end: Processing files: kernel-xenU-devel-2.6.9-67.0.20.EL Checking