search for: c9t3d0

...c8t6d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c8t7d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 raidz2-2 ONLINE 0 0 0 c9t0d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c9t1d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c9t2d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c9t3d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c9t4d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c9t5d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c9t6d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 logs mirror-3 ONLINE 0 0 0 c10d1s0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c11d0...

...confused about drive IDs. The "c5t0d0" names are very far removed from the real world, and possibly they''ve gotten screwed up somehow. Is devfsadm supposed to fix those, or does it only delete excess? Reason I believe it''s confused: zpool status shows mirror-0 on c9t3d0, c9t2d0, and c9t5d0. But format shows the one remaining Seagate 400GB drive at c5t0d0 (my initial pool was two of those; I replaced one with a Samsung 1TB earlier today). Now the mirror with three drives in is my very first mirror, which has to have the one remaining Seagate drive in it (give...

...m running > snv_134. I''m still pretty badly lost in the whole repository / > package thing with Solaris, most of my brain cells were already > occupied with Red Hat, Debian, and Perl package information :-( . > Where do I look? > > Are the controller port IDs, the "C9T3D0" things that ZFS likes, > reasonably stable? They won''t change just because I add or remove > drives, right; only maybe if I change controller cards?

...1 data errors, use ''-v'' for a list pool: uberdisk2 state: DEGRADED scrub: scrub in progress for 3h3m, 32.26% done, 6h24m to go config: NAME STATE READ WRITE CKSUM uberdisk2 DEGRADED 0 0 0 raidz2 DEGRADED 0 0 0 c9t3d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c9t4d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c9t5d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c10t3d0 REMOVED 0 0 0 c10t4d0 REMOVED 0 0 0 c11t3d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c11t4d0 ONLINE 0 0 0...

...3 1.22M 56.1K c8t7d0 - - 34 3 1.22M 56.1K raidz2 12.0T 631G 101 7 6.50M 294K c9t0d0 - - 39 3 1.56M 58.7K c9t1d0 - - 39 3 1.56M 58.7K c9t2d0 - - 39 3 1.56M 58.7K c9t3d0 - - 39 3 1.56M 58.7K spare - - 472 42 7.16M 83.9K c9t4d0 - - 39 3 1.56M 58.7K c9t7d0 - - 0 259 2 6.85M c9t5d0 - - 39 3 1.56M 58.7K c9t6d0 - - 38...

Hi all I''m seeing some rather bad resilver times for a pool of WD Green drives (I know, bad drives, but leave that). Does resilver go through the whole pool or just the VDEV in question? -- Vennlige hilsener / Best regards roy -- Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk (+47) 97542685 roy at karlsbakk.net http://blogg.karlsbakk.net/ -- I all pedagogikk er det essensielt at pensum presenteres

Hello, I''m working with someone who replaced a failed 1TB drive (50% utilized), on an X4540 running OS build 134, and I think something must be wrong. Last Tuesday afternoon, zpool status reported: scrub: resilver in progress for 306h0m, 63.87% done, 173h7m to go and a week being 168 hours, that put completion at sometime tomorrow night. However, he just reported zpool status shows: