Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "c9fb4761".
2013 Mar 12
0
[LLVMdev] LNT BenchmarkGame
> Is there any chance that the results are not being checked correctly? Any
> other ideas?
I think I vaguely convinced myself that the infrastructure didn't
actually check whether tests it classified as benchmarks passed or
failed. Not sure I had any good evidence for it other than things like
you're seeing.
> I'm tempted to just change the reference output and see what
>
2013 Mar 12
5
[LLVMdev] LNT BenchmarkGame
...ibrary
dependent). Is there a way to turn on the dynamic generation of the native
file instead of copying it from the reference_output?
cheers,
--renato
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20130312/c9fb4761/attachment.html>
2013 Mar 12
4
[LLVMdev] LNT BenchmarkGame
Hi folks,
I'm investigating the LNT failures on our bot and found that I cannot
reproduce BenchmarkGame pass.
I've compiled it with GCC, Clang on both ARM and x86_64, with -O3 or with
the arguments that the test-suite passes to it and all I can get is the
result below:
Found duplicate: 420094
Found duplicate: 341335
Found duplicate: 150397
Found duplicate: 157527
Found duplicate: 269724