Displaying 2 results from an estimated 2 matches for "c91991f0".
2013 Sep 04
2
[LLVMdev] Semantics of noalias with vector of pointers?
Hi,
What are the intended semantics of noalias when applied to a vector of
pointers? signext/zeroext parameter attributes are incorrectly rejected
for vectors (bug 15391), and I'm not sure if the same is true for
noalias when applied to pointer vectors. There's no mention of it in the
langref, and the verifier currently rejects it. Is it supposed to work?
Are pointers within the
2013 Sep 04
0
[LLVMdev] Semantics of noalias with vector of pointers?
Do you actually have a use case for such attributes, or are you just trying
all possible attributes on all possible types to see what breaks? ;-)
It would be theoretically possible to define semantics for signext/zerext
or even noalias for vectors. However it's not clear whether those are
really desirable without motivating use cases.
Dan
On Wed, Sep 4, 2013 at 2:31 PM, Matt Arsenault